Perception of the Progressing Digitization and Transformation of the German Health Care System Among Experts and the Public: Mixed Methods Study

被引:21
作者
Hansen, Arne [1 ,2 ]
Herrmann, Maximilian [1 ,3 ]
Ehlers, Jan P. [1 ]
Mondritzki, Thomas [3 ]
Hensel, Kai Oliver [4 ,5 ]
Truebel, Hubert [1 ,3 ]
Boehme, Philip [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Didact & Educ Res Hlth Sci, Witten, Germany
[2] Johnson & Johnson Med GmbH, Prod Planning & Logist, Norderstedt, Germany
[3] Bayer Aktiengesellsch, Cardiovasc Res, Apratherweg 18a, D-42113 Wuppertal, Germany
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge, England
[5] Witten Herdecke Univ, Dept Pediat, Ctr Clin & Translat Res, Witten, Germany
关键词
digitization; health care sector; transformation; mixed method; delivery of health care; diffusion of innovation; reform; HEART-FAILURE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; TELEMEDICINE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2196/14689
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Health care systems worldwide are struggling to keep rising costs at bay with only modest outcome improvement among many diseases. Digitization with technologies like Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning algorithms might address this. Although digital technologies have been successfully applied in clinical studies the effect on the overall health care system so far was limited. The regulatory ecosystem or data privacy might be responsible, but other reasons may also predominate. Objective: We analyzed how the digitization of the German health care market is currently perceived among different stakeholders and investigated reasons for its slow adaption. Methods: This was a mixed methods study split into a qualitative Part A using the conceptual approach of the Grounded Theory and a quantitative Part B using the Delphi method. For Part A we interviewed experts in the health care system and converted the results into 17 hypotheses. The Delphi method consisted of an online survey which was sent to the participants via email and was available for three months. For the assessment of the 17 hypotheses, the participants were given a six-point Likert scale. The participants were grouped into patients, physicians, and providers of services within the German health care market. Results: There was a strong alignment of opinions on the hypotheses between experts (N=21) and survey participants (N=733), with 70.5% overall agreement on 12/17 hypotheses. Physicians demonstrated the lowest level of agreement with the expert panel at 88% (15/17) disagreement, with the hypotheses "H8: Digitization in the health care system will free up jobs," and "H6: Digitization in the health care system will empower the patients," perceived to be in profound disagreement (P=.036 and P<.001, respectively). Conclusions: Despite the firm agreement among participants and experts regarding the impact of digitization on the health care system, physicians demonstrated a more negative attitude. We assume that this might be a factor contributing to the slow adoption of digitization in practice. Physicians might be struggling with changing power structures, so future measures to transform the market should involve them to a larger degree.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 140
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Communicative and ethical aspects of physician-patient relationship in extreme situations [J].
Alkatout I. .
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 2015, 165 (23-24) :491-498
[2]   The workforce for health in a globalized context - global shortages and international migration [J].
Aluttis, Christoph ;
Bishaw, Tewabech ;
Frank, Martina W. .
GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2014, 7 :1-7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WHO GUID HAND HYG HL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Redefining healthcare
[5]   MEDICATION ADHERENCE: HELPING PATIENTS TAKE THEIR MEDICINES AS DIRECTED [J].
Benjamin, Regina M. .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2012, 127 (01) :2-3
[6]  
Charmaz K., 2006, Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis
[7]   Treating rural paediatric obesity through telemedicine vs. telephone: Outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial [J].
Davis, Ann M. ;
Sampilo, Marilyn ;
Gallagher, Katherine Steiger ;
Dean, Kelsey ;
Saroja, M. Baby ;
Yu, Qing ;
He, Jianghua ;
Sporn, Nora .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2016, 22 (02) :86-95
[8]  
Delbecq A. L. VdVAH, 1976, Group & Organization Studies, P256, DOI DOI 10.1177/105960117600100220
[9]  
European Patients Forum, 2019, STRONG PAT VOIC DRIV
[10]   Effectiveness of Digital Medicines to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective, Open-Label, Cluster-Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial [J].
Frias, Juan ;
Virdi, Naunihal ;
Raja, Praveen ;
Kim, Yoona ;
Savage, George ;
Osterberg, Lars .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (07)