Helping Thy Neighbor? Prosocial Reactions to Observed Abusive Supervision in the Workplace

被引:88
作者
Priesemuth, Manuela [1 ]
Schminke, Marshall [2 ]
机构
[1] Villanova Univ, 800 E Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
overall justice; ethical efficacy; abusive supervision; third-party unfairness; prosocial behavior; victim protection; behavioral ethics; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; MODERATING ROLE; 3RD-PARTY REACTIONS; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; JOB-PERFORMANCE; DEONTIC JUSTICE; MEDIATION; LEADERSHIP; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1177/0149206317702219
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines employee reactions to observing abusive supervision at work. Specifically, we integrate deonance theory with fairness theory and social cognitive theory to explore when and why employees who witness abuse toward a coworker engage in prosocial behavior intended to protect the victim. We first develop a moderated mediation model of prosocial responses to abuse, which identifies overall fairness as a first- and second-stage moderator, influencing the relationships between observed abusive supervision and observer deontic reactions and between deontic reactions and coworker protective behavior. Results from Study 1 support a model in which overall justice moderates the second link, indicating that fair norms and principles might prompt observers of abuse to direct their deontic anger toward coworker protective responses. Study 2 extends this work by further exploring the mediating mechanism by which overall fairness moderates the relationship between deontic anger and prosocial behavior for the coworker. Utilizing a critical incident technique, Study 2 reveals support for a mediated moderation model, indicating that the moderating effect of overall fairness occurs through its impact on ethical efficacy. These findings contribute to work on abusive supervision, third-party responses to injustice, and overall fairness by helping to better understand observer prosocial reactions to abusive supervision.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1251
页数:27
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, DOI 10.2307/2348581
[2]   EGOCENTRIC STANDARDS OF CONDUCT EVALUATION [J].
ALICKE, MD .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 14 (02) :171-192
[3]  
Ambrose M. L., 2006, ANN M SOC IND ORG PS
[4]   The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation [J].
Ambrose, Maureen L. ;
Schminke, Marshall .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :491-500
[5]   The self-importance of moral identity [J].
Aquino, K ;
Reed, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (06) :1423-1440
[6]   Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations [J].
Aquino, Karl ;
Tripp, Thomas M. ;
Bies, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (03) :653-668
[7]   The Ethical Climate and Context of Organizations: A Comprehensive Model [J].
Arnaud, Anke ;
Schminke, Marshall .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (06) :1767-1780
[8]  
Banaji M.R., 2003, Harvard Business Review, V12, P1
[9]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[10]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control