Repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile using enzyme immunoassay in patients with inflammatory bowel disease increases diagnostic yield

被引:20
作者
Deshpande, Abhishek [1 ]
Pasupuleti, Vinay [2 ]
Patel, Preethi [3 ]
Pant, Chaitanya [4 ]
Pagadala, Mangesh [5 ]
Hall, Geraldine [6 ]
Hu, Bo [7 ]
Jain, Anil [8 ]
Rolston, David D. K. [9 ]
Sferra, Thomas J. [4 ]
Atreja, Ashish [5 ]
机构
[1] Neurol Inst, Dept Neurol Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Inst Med, Dept Hosp Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
[5] Inst Digest Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Cleveland Clin, Dept Clin Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[7] Lerner Res Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[8] Cleveland Clin, Inst Med, Dept Internal Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Danville, PA 17822 USA
关键词
Bacteria; Clostridium difficile; Diagnostic yield; Hospital-acquired infection; Inflammatory bowel disease; RAPID DETECTION; INFECTION; PCR; COLITIS; SOCIETY; CULTURE; SAMPLES; ASSAY; GENE;
D O I
10.1185/03007995.2012.717529
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing. CDI is diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed on stool samples. An earlier study evaluating EIA in IBD patients with CDI suggested that more than one stool sample be tested to increase diagnostic yield. We investigated whether repeat stool testing improves diagnostic accuracy for CDI in hospitalized IBD patients compared to hospitalized patients with CDI and no IBD. Methods: We performed retrospective data analysis from January 2005-May 2011 on 63,086 hospitalized patients who were tested for CDI using EIA or PCR. Of these, 2579 patients had IBD. Transition probabilities were calculated based on results from repeated tests. Results: Inclusive of all inpatients tested for CDI, 56,583 were tested using toxin EIA and 6503 were tested using PCR. In patients with no IBD, the first stool sample tested was positive in 90% and 94% with EIA and PCR respectively. In IBD patients tested using EIA, 101 were diagnosed with CDI. The first stool sample tested was positive in 81% of patients. Successive second and third stool samples yielded additional 14% and 5% CDI positive IBD patients. Conclusions: Approximately one in five IBD patients with CDI required repeat testing to yield a positive result with EIA. There are minimal diagnostic gains of repeat testing by EIA or PCR in patients without IBD. We recommend repeat stool testing for CDI when using EIA to increase diagnostic yield in IBD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1553 / 1560
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Nonutility of Repeat Laboratory Testing for Detection of Clostridium difficile by Use of PCR or Enzyme Immunoassay [J].
Aichinger, Elisabeth ;
Schleck, Cathy D. ;
Harmsen, William S. ;
Nyre, Lisa M. ;
Patel, Robin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (11) :3795-3797
[2]   Excess hospitalisation burden associated with Clostridium difficile in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Ananthakrishnan, A. N. ;
McGinley, E. L. ;
Binion, D. G. .
GUT, 2008, 57 (02) :205-210
[3]  
[Anonymous], F1000 MED REP
[4]   Repeated Stool Toxin Testing for Diagnosing Difficile Colitis Is Still Valid [J].
Arabi, Ziad ;
Boxwalla, Asgar .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 102 (10) :993-994
[5]   Rapid Detection of Toxigenic Strains of Clostridium difficile in Diarrheal Stools by Real-Time PCR [J].
Barbut, Frederic ;
Braun, Mylena ;
Burghoffer, Beatrice ;
Lalande, Valerie ;
Eckert, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (04) :1276-1277
[6]   Antibiotic-associated diarrhea [J].
Bartlett, JG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (05) :334-339
[7]   Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces by real-time PCR [J].
Bélanger, SD ;
Boissinot, M ;
Clairoux, N ;
Picard, FJ ;
Bergeron, MG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (02) :730-734
[8]   The challenges posed by reemerging Clostridium difficile infection [J].
Blossom, David B. ;
McDonald, L. Clifford .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 45 (02) :222-227
[9]   Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults: 2010 Update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [J].
Cohen, Stuart H. ;
Gerding, Dale N. ;
Johnson, Stuart ;
Kelly, Ciaran P. ;
Loo, Vivian G. ;
McDonald, L. Clifford ;
Pepin, Jacques ;
Wilcox, Mark H. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (05) :431-455
[10]   European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): Data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-infection (CDI) [J].
Crobach, M. J. T. ;
Dekkers, O. M. ;
Wilcox, M. H. ;
Kuijper, E. J. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2009, 15 (12) :1053-1066