Bending Resistance and Cyclic Fatigue Life of Reciproc, Unicone, and WaveOne Reciprocating Instruments

被引:18
作者
Silva, Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal [1 ]
Villarino, Laise Silva [1 ]
Vieira, Victor Talarico Leal [1 ]
Accorsi-Mendonca, Thais [1 ]
Antunes, Henrique dos Santos [1 ]
De-Deus, Gustavo [1 ]
Lopes, Helio Pereira [2 ]
机构
[1] Grande Rio Univ UNIGRANRIO, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Estacio Sa Univ UNESA, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Bending resistance; cyclic fatigue; reciprocating movement; ENDODONTIC PREPARATION; MOVEMENT; PROTAPER; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study evaluated the bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of a new single-file reciprocating instrument (Unicone; Medin, Nove West na Morave, Czech Republic). Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer) instruments were used as references for comparison. Methods: Flexibility was determined by 45 degrees bending tests using a universal testing machine. The cyclic fatigue test was performed using a custom-made device. For this test, an artificial canal with a 60 degrees angle and a 5-mm radius of curvature was used. Scanning electron microscopic analysis was performed to determine the mode of fracture and possible deformations at the helical shaft. Statistical analysis for the bending resistance test was performed using parametric methods (ie, 1-way analysis of variance). Post hoc pair-wise comparisons were performed using the Tukey test for Multiple comparisons (P < .05). Weibull analysis was used to calculate the mean life, beta, and eta parameters. Results: Reciproc presented significantly lower bending resistance than the other tested systems (P < .05), whereas no differences were observed between WaveOne and Unicone (P > .05). When mean life was compared among the brands, Reciproc lasted longer than WaveOne with a probability of 99.9%, longer than Unicone in the "RECIPROC ALL" mode with a probability of 99.9%, and longer than Unicone in the "WAVEONE ALL" mode with a probability of 99.9% (all statistically significant). Moreover, WaveOne lasted longer than Unicone in the "RECIPROC ALL" mode with a probability of 98.5% and longer than Unicone in the "WAVEONE ALL" mode with a probability of 99.8% call statistically significant). Finally, Unicone in the "RECIPROC ALL" mode lasted longer than Unicone in the "WAVEONE ALL" mode with a probability of 95.3% (statistically significant). Conclusions: The new reciprocating instrument Unicone showed lower cyclic fatigue resistance compared with Reciproc R25 and WaveOne Primary files.
引用
收藏
页码:1789 / 1793
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] K3 endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: Breakage and distortion, in severely curved roots of molars
    Ankrum, MT
    Hartwell, GR
    Truitt, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2004, 30 (04) : 234 - 237
  • [2] Differences in Cyclic Fatigue Resistance at Apical and Coronal Levels of Reciproc and Wave One New Files
    Arias, Ana
    Perez-Higueras, Juan J.
    de la Macorra, Jose C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (09) : 1244 - 1248
  • [3] Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement
    De-Deus, G.
    Moreira, E. J. L.
    Lopes, H. P.
    Elias, C. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2010, 43 (12) : 1063 - 1068
  • [4] Bending Resistance and Dynamic and Static Cyclic Fatigue Life of Reciproc and WaveOne Large Instruments
    De-Deus, Gustavo
    Leal Vieira, Victor Talarico
    Nogueira da Silva, Emmanuel Joao
    Lopes, Helio
    Elias, Carlos Nelson
    Moreira, Edson Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2014, 40 (04) : 575 - 579
  • [5] Kinematics of 2 Reciprocating Endodontic Motors: The Difference between Actual and Set Values
    Fidler, Ales
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2014, 40 (07) : 990 - 994
  • [6] Influence of Different Angles of Reciprocation on the Cyclic Fatigue of Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments
    Gambarini, Gianluca
    Rubini, Alessio Giansiracusa
    Al Sudani, Dina
    Gergi, Richard
    Culla, Antonio
    De Angelis, Francesca
    Di Carlo, Stefano
    Pompa, Giorgio
    Osta, Nada
    Testarelli, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (10) : 1408 - 1411
  • [7] Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review-Part I: Historic Perspectives and Current Applications
    Grande, Nicola Maria
    Ahmed, Hany Mohamed Aly
    Cohen, Stephen
    Bukiet, Frederic
    Plotino, Gianluca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2015, 41 (11) : 1778 - 1783
  • [8] Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments?
    Kiefner, P.
    Ban, M.
    De-Deus, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2014, 47 (05) : 430 - 436
  • [9] Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Two New Nickel-Titanium Instruments Used in Reciprocation Motion: Reciproc Versus WaveOne
    Kim, Hyeon-Cheol
    Kwak, Sang-Won
    Cheung, Gary Shun-Pan
    Ko, Dae-Hoon
    Chung, Se-Min
    Lee, WooCheol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (04) : 541 - 544
  • [10] Fatigue Life of Reciproc and Mtwo Instruments Subjected to Static and Dynamic Tests
    Lopes, Helio P.
    Elias, Carlos N.
    Vieira, Marcia V. B.
    Siqueira, Jose F., Jr.
    Mangelli, Marcelo
    Lopes, Weber S. P.
    Vieira, Victor T. L.
    Alves, Flavio R. F.
    Oliveira, Julio C. M.
    Soares, Thaiane G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2013, 39 (05) : 693 - 696