Diagnostic precision of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents. English version

被引:0
|
作者
Heller, A. R. [1 ]
Salvador, N. [1 ]
Frank, M. [3 ]
Schiffner, J. [4 ]
Kipke, R. [5 ]
Kleber, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Med Fac Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Ctr Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Dresden, Germany
[3] DRF Air Rescue Base Christoph 38, Dresden, Germany
[4] German Soc Disaster Med DGKM, Red Cross Saxonia, Div Mitteldeutschland, Dresden, Germany
[5] City Dresden Fire Dept & Disaster Preparedness, EMS Teaching Unit, Dresden, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2019年 / 68卷
关键词
Mass casualty Incident; Disaster management; Emergency preparedness; Triage;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-017-0352-y
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundRegarding survival and quality of life recent mass casualty incidents again emphasize the importance of early identification of the correct degree of injury/illness to enable prioritization of treatment amongst patients and their transportation to an appropriate hospital. The present study investigated existing triage algorithms in terms of sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) as well as its process duration in arelevant emergency patient cohort.MethodsIn this study 500 consecutive air rescue missions were evaluated by means of standardized patient records. Classification of patients was accomplished by 19emergency physicians. Every case was independently classified by at least 3physicians without considering any triage algorithm. Existing triage algorithms Primary Ranking for Initial Orientation in Emergency Medical Services (PRIOR), modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (mSTaRT), Field Triage Score (FTS), Amberg-Schwandorf Algorithm for Triage (ASAV), Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (STaRT), Care Flight, and Triage Sieve were additionally carried out computer based on each case, to enable calculation of quality criteria.ResultsThe analyzed cohort had an age of (mean SD) 59 25years, aNACA score of 3.5 1.1 and consisted of 57% men. On arrival 8patients were deceased. Consequently, 492 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of triage categories T1/T2/T3 were 10%/47%/43%, respectively. The highest diagnostic quality was achieved with START, mSTaRT, and ASAV yielding aSE of 78% and aSP ranging from 80-83%. The subgroup of surgical patients reached aSE of 95% and aSP between 85-91%. The newly established algorithm PRIOR exerted aSE of 90% but merely aSP of 54% in the overall cohort thereby consuming the longest time for overall decision.ConclusionTriage procedures with acceptable diagnostic quality exist to identify the most severely injured. Due to its high rate of false positive results (over-triage) the recently developed PRIOR algorithm will cause overload of available resources for the severely injured within mass casualty incident missions. Non-surgical patients still are poorly identified by the available algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Diagnostic quality of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents
    Heller, A. R.
    Salvador, N.
    Frank, M.
    Schiffner, J.
    Kipke, R.
    Kleber, C.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2017, 66 (10): : 762 - 772
  • [2] Diagnostic precision of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents. English version; [Diagnostische Güte von Vorsichtungsalgorithmen für den Massenanfall von Verletzten und Erkrankten. Englische Version]
    Heller A.R.
    Salvador N.
    Frank M.
    Schiffner J.
    Kipke R.
    Kleber C.
    Der Anaesthesist, 2019, 68 (Suppl 1) : 15 - 24
  • [3] Validation of secondary triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents
    Heller, Axel R.
    Neidel, Tobias
    Klotz, Patrick J.
    Solarek, Andre
    Kowalzik, Barbara
    Juncken, Kathleen
    Kleber, Christan
    ANAESTHESIOLOGIE, 2023, 72 : S1 - S9
  • [4] Triage protocols for mass casualty incidents. An overview 30 years after START
    Streckbein, S.
    Kohlmann, T.
    Luxen, J.
    Birkholz, T.
    Prueckner, S.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2016, 119 (08): : 620 - 630
  • [5] Validation of secondary triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents-A simulation-based study-German version
    Heller, Axel R.
    Neidel, Tobias
    Klotz, Patrick J.
    Solarek, Andre
    Kowalzik, Barbara
    Juncken, Kathleen
    Kleber, Christan
    ANAESTHESIOLOGIE, 2023, 72 (07): : 467 - 476
  • [6] Triage - and the management of mass casualty incidents
    Peters, Sigurd
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2010, 104 (05): : 411 - 413
  • [7] Performance of Google bard and ChatGPT in mass casualty incidents triage
    Gan, Rick Kye
    Ogbodo, Jude Chukwuebuka
    Wee, Yong Zheng
    Gan, Ann Zee
    Gonzalez, Pedro Arcos
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 75 : 72 - 78
  • [8] Precision of In-Hospital Triage in Mass-Casualty Incidents after Terror Attacks
    Ashkenazi, Itamar
    Kessel, Boris
    Khashan, Tawfik
    Haspel, Jacob
    Oren, Meir
    Olsha, Oded
    Alfici, Ricardo
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (01) : 20 - 23
  • [9] Pronouncement of death at mass casualty incidents. A resource-oriented design
    Fischer, F. T.
    Scharf, F.
    Lochner, S.
    Hipp, R.
    Peschel, O.
    NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2016, 19 (02): : 122 - 128
  • [10] Diagnostische Güte von Vorsichtungsalgorithmen für den Massenanfall von Verletzten und ErkranktenDiagnostic quality of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents
    A. R. Heller
    N. Salvador
    M. Frank
    J. Schiffner
    R. Kipke
    C. Kleber
    Der Anaesthesist, 2017, 66 (10) : 762 - 772