Plasma chemical degradation of phenol in solution by gas-liquid gliding arc discharge

被引:60
|
作者
Yan, JH [1 ]
Du, CM
Li, XD
Sun, XD
Ni, MJ
Cen, KF
Cheron, B
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Ultilizat, Inst Thermal Power Engn, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Rouen, CORIA, UMR 6614, F-76821 Mont St Aignan, France
来源
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2005年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0963-0252/14/4/001
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
A gas-liquid gliding arc (glidarc) discharge reactor is used to degrade high concentration phenol solution. Phenol solution with 1878 mg L-1 initial chemical oxygen demand (COD) is treated by spraying directly into the plasma zone formed between two electrodes through a gas-liquid two phase atomizing nozzle. A number of parameters such as voltage waveform, solution concentration, electrode material, nature of the carrier gases and the gas-liquid ratio are examined. It is found that the voltage waveform of gas-liquid gliding arc discharge is more irregular than that of gas gliding arc discharge, and the breakdown voltage of gas-liquid gliding are discharge is lower than that of gas gliding arc discharge. The COD abatement of phenol solution with stainless steel as the electrode material is higher than that with brass and aluminium. The increasing electrode thickness and the increasing gas-liquid ratio and carrier gas such as oxygen can increase the degradation of phenol. The final COD of the solution is 173 mg L-1; either air or oxygen is used as the carrier gas, and the solution treated is acidic. The variation of pH and conductivity and the formation of hydrogen peroxide and ozone are measured. The occurrence Of CO2 is detected during the plasma treatment: the maximum concentration is 18 000 ppm. While H-2 and NOx are also detected during the plasma phase, p-nitrosophenol (C6H5NO2) and p-nitrophenol (C6H5NO3) are detected in the solution treated.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 644
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characteristics of gliding arc discharge plasma
    Lin Lie
    Wu Bin
    Yang Chi
    Wu Chengkang
    PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 8 (06) : 653 - 655
  • [32] Characteristics of Gliding Arc Discharge Plasma
    林烈
    吴彬
    杨驰
    吴承康
    Plasma Science and Technology, 2006, 8 (06) : 653 - 655
  • [33] Degradation of antibiotic contaminants from water by gas-liquid underwater discharge plasma
    Lu, Fu
    Zhou, Jian
    Wu, Zhengwei
    PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 25 (03)
  • [34] Degradation and mineralization of ciprofloxacin by gas-liquid discharge non-thermal plasma
    Hu, Shuheng
    Liu, Xinghao
    Xu, Zimu
    Wang, Jiaquan
    Li, Yunxia
    Shen, Jie
    Lan, Yan
    Cheng, Cheng
    PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [35] Phenol Degradation by a Hybrid Gas-liquid Discharge Reactor with Digital-analog Mixed Control
    Xie Rui
    Chen Chao
    Li Wuhua
    He Xiangning
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 5013 - 5016
  • [36] Characteristics of Gliding Arc Discharge Plasma
    林烈
    吴彬
    杨驰
    吴承康
    Plasma Science and Technology, 2006, (06) : 653 - 655
  • [37] ANALYSIS OF VOC DEGRADATION IN GLIDING ARC DISCHARGE
    Grossmannova, H.
    Krcma, F.
    CAPPSA 2005, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 222 - 225
  • [38] Experimental study on gliding discharge mode of rotating gliding arc discharge plasma
    Lei Jian-Ping
    He Li-Ming
    Chen Yi
    Chen Gao-Cheng
    Zhao Bing-Bing
    Zhao Zhi-Yu
    Zhang Hua-Lei
    Deng Jun
    Fei Li
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2020, 69 (19)
  • [39] Initiation of Fenton process by plasma gliding arc discharge for the degradation of paracetamol in water
    Slamani, Samira
    Abdelmalek, Fatiha
    Ghezzar, Mouffok Redouane
    Addou, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY A-CHEMISTRY, 2018, 359 : 1 - 10
  • [40] Degradation of tetracycline in aqueous solution by persulphate assisted gas-liquid dielectric barrier discharge
    Wu, Haixia
    Fan, Jiawei
    Liu, Feng
    Shu, Lisha
    Yin, Baojian
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 35 (03) : 902 - 912