Prognostic significance of histomorphologic features of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: A single center study

被引:1
|
作者
Alhamar, Mohamed [1 ]
Jabbar, Absia [2 ]
Deebajah, Mustafa [3 ]
Diaz, Mireya [4 ]
Alanee, Shaheen [5 ]
Hassan, Oudai [1 ]
Williamson, Sean R. [6 ]
Schultz, Daniel [1 ]
Gupta, Nilesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] SUNY Downstate Hosp, Dept Pathol, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Pathol, Royal Oak, MI USA
[4] Henry Ford Hosp, Vattikutti Urol Inst, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[5] Detroit Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Cleveland Clin, Dept Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Prostate; Neoplasms; Lymph nodes; Metastasis; Lymph node excision; EXTRANODAL EXTENSION; DISSECTION; SURVIVAL; ADJUVANT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: We assessed the prognostic value of histomorphologic features of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy Materials and Methods: We evaluated the effect of the features of LN metastasis on the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in 280 LN-positive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2006 to 2018. LN specific parameters recorded included number of metastatic LNs, size of the largest metastatic focus, Gleason Grade (GG) of the metastatic focus, and extranodal extension (ENE). Results: A solitary positive LN was found in 166/280 (59%), 95/280 (34%) patients had 2-4 positive LNs, and 19/280 (7%) had 5 or more positive LNs. The size of the largest metastatic focus > 2 mm (macrometastasis) in 154/261 (59%). GG of the metastatic focus was as follows: GG 1-2: 29/224 (13%); GG 3: 27/224 (12%); and GG 4-5: 168/224 (75%). ENE was identified in 99/244 (41%). We found the number of LNs positive (2-4 vs. 1 Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.5; P = 0.04) and GG of the metastatic focus (GG 4&5 vs. 1-3 HR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.14-3.2; P= 0.014) to be independent predictors of the risk of BCR after surgery on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our study showed the number of LNs positive and GG of the LN metastatic focus to be significant independent predictors of BCR after radical prostatectomy. We recommend reporting histomorphologic parameters of LN metastasis as they may help in defining BCR risk categorization. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:829.e1 / 829.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterization of Lymph Node Tumor Burden in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Patients after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
    Gottlieb, Josh
    Chang, Shu-Ching
    Choe, Jane
    Grunkemeier, Gary L.
    Hanes, Douglas A.
    Krasne, David
    Hoon, Dave S. B.
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [32] Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer
    Ko, Kyungtae
    Jeong, In Gab
    Choi, Woo Suk
    Lim, Ju Hyun
    Suh, Ja Hee
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Park, Yangsoon
    Moon, Kyung Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Kwak, Cheol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (09): : 6141 - 6148
  • [33] Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Metastases in Pancreatic Head Cancer Treated with Extended Lymphadenectomy: Not Just a Matter of Numbers
    Massucco, Paolo
    Ribero, Dario
    Sgotto, Enrico
    Mellano, Alfredo
    Muratore, Andrea
    Capussotti, Lorenzo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (12) : 3323 - 3332
  • [34] Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Schumacher, Martin C.
    Fiona, C. Burkhard
    Thalmann, George N.
    Fleischmann, Achim
    Studer, Urs E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) : 344 - 352
  • [35] The Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Gakis, Georgios
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Joniau, Steven
    Karazanashvili, Guram
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Mattei, Agostino
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Wirth, Manfred
    Stief, Christian G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [36] Assessment of Lymph Node Yield After Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Comparison Between Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy in the Modern Era
    Truesdale, Matthew D.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Cheetham, Philippa J.
    Hruby, Gregory W.
    Turk, Andrew T.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (07) : 1055 - 1060
  • [37] Important prognostic significance of lymph node density in patients with node positive oral tongue cancer
    Lieng, Hester
    Gebski, Val J.
    Morgan, Gary J.
    Veness, Michael J.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (09) : 681 - 686
  • [38] Eliminating microscopic lymph node metastasis by performing pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Furubayashi, Nobuki
    Negishi, Takahito
    Uozumi, Tomoharu
    Shiraishi, Kouichi
    Taguchi, Kenichi
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    Nakamura, Motonobu
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (02) : 104 - 110
  • [39] Metastatic lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic variable in colorectal cancer: study of 113 patients
    Priolli, D. G.
    Cardinalli, I. Aparecida
    Pereira, J. Aires
    Alfredo, C. Helaehil
    Margarido, N. Fontana
    Real Martinez, C. A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2009, 13 (02) : 113 - 121
  • [40] Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
    Iwamura, Hiromichi
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Narita, Takuma
    Ozaki, Yusuke
    Konishi, Sakae
    Horiguchi, Hirotaka
    Kodama, Hirotake
    Kojima, Yuta
    Fujita, Naoki
    Okamoto, Teppei
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Yoneyama, Tohru
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
    Ohyama, Chikara
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)