Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for the NPL proton calorimeter

被引:1
作者
Petrie, L. M. [1 ,2 ]
Galer, S. [1 ]
Shipley, D. [1 ]
Palmans, H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, Radiat Dosimetry Grp, Teddington, Middx, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
[3] EBG MedAustron GmbH, Dept Med Phys, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Monte Carlo; TOPAS; Dosimetry; Correction factors; Calorimeter; Primary standards; STANDARDS; DOSIMETRY; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.12.014
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Introduction: The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) proton graphite calorimeter is a primary standard level instrument, capable of determining absorbed dose for proton beam radiotherapy dosimetry in the UK. In order to obtain the absorbed dose from the calorimeter measurement data, various correction factors need to be applied, including the gap correction factor (k(gap)) and the volume averaging correction factor (k(vol)) which were calculated in this work. k(gap) quantifies the effect of the vacuum gaps within the calorimeter on the dose to the core, while k(vol) accounts for the difference between the measurements of dose to the whole core and what is actually required: dose at a point in the centre of the core. Methods: A simplified model of the calorimeter was created in TOPAS (a Monte Carlo particle transport simulation software based on the GEANT4 toolkit) and simulations were run at five different monoenergetic beam energies (60, 100, 150, 190 & 230 MeV). For the k(gap) correction factor, the simplified calorimeter model was compared to a compensated model of the calorimeter where the graphite components were shifted towards the beam until they touch and then the vacuum gaps were replaced with graphite. For the k(vol) correction factor the dose in the core of the calorimeter was compared to the dose in a small volume (0.25 mm radius) in the centre of the core. Results: The gap correction factor, k(gap), had a non-linear dependence on energy, ranging from 0.06% above unity at 60 MeV to 0.36% above unity at 230 MeV. The volume averaging correction factor was found to be negligible, with an uncertainty of 0.065%. Conclusions: The gap correction factor and volume averaging correction factor, along with their associated uncertainties have been calculated. These correction factors are essential in establishing the calorimeter as a primary standard.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 385
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Monte Carlo simulation of a water tank of the Cerenkov calorimeter [J].
Chen, MJ ;
Zhang, F ;
Wang, YF .
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2003, 27 (11) :1015-1018
[42]   Monte Carlo calculated output correction factors for Gafchromic EBT3 film for relative dosimetry in small stereotactic radiosurgery fields [J].
Johnny E. Morales ;
Martin Butson ;
Robin Hill ;
Scott B. Crowe ;
J. V. Trapp .
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2020, 43 :609-616
[43]   Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions from circular collimators for radiosurgical beams [J].
Esnaashari, K. N. ;
Allahverdi, M. ;
Gharaati, H. ;
Shahriari, M. .
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2007, 5 (01) :31-36
[44]   Calculations of magnetic field correction factors for ionization chambers in a transverse magnetic field using Monte Carlo code TOPAS [J].
Mao, Lingli ;
Pei, Xi ;
Chao, Tsi-Chian ;
Xu, Xie George .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2021, 183
[45]   Monte Carlo-derived ionization chamber correction factors in therapeutic carbon ion beams [J].
Khan, Ahtesham Ullah ;
Simiele, Eric A. ;
DeWerd, Larry A. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (19)
[46]   Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plastic phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry [J].
Araki, Fujio ;
Hanyu, Yuji ;
Fukuoka, Miyoko ;
Matsumoto, Kenji ;
Okumura, Masahiko ;
Oguchi, Hiroshi .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (07) :2992-3001
[47]   Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factors for monoenergetic carbon-ion beams [J].
Stolzenberg, Jessica ;
Sasse, Pascal ;
Baumann, Kilian ;
Poppe, Bjoern ;
Looe, Hui Khee .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 :S3314-S3316
[48]   Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film [J].
Sutherland, J. G. H. ;
Rogers, D. W. O. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (03) :1110-1116
[49]   The effect of ambient pressure on well chamber response: Monte Carlo calculated results for the HDR 1000 plus [J].
Bohm, TD ;
Griffin, SL ;
DeLuca, PM ;
DeWerd, LA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) :1103-1114
[50]   Uncertainty of ROCOF calculated by means of Monte Carlo method [J].
Sira, Martin ;
Maslan, Stanislav ;
Skalicka, Tereza .
2018 CONFERENCE ON PRECISION ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS (CPEM 2018), 2018,