Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for the NPL proton calorimeter

被引:1
作者
Petrie, L. M. [1 ,2 ]
Galer, S. [1 ]
Shipley, D. [1 ]
Palmans, H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, Radiat Dosimetry Grp, Teddington, Middx, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
[3] EBG MedAustron GmbH, Dept Med Phys, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Monte Carlo; TOPAS; Dosimetry; Correction factors; Calorimeter; Primary standards; STANDARDS; DOSIMETRY; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.12.014
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Introduction: The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) proton graphite calorimeter is a primary standard level instrument, capable of determining absorbed dose for proton beam radiotherapy dosimetry in the UK. In order to obtain the absorbed dose from the calorimeter measurement data, various correction factors need to be applied, including the gap correction factor (k(gap)) and the volume averaging correction factor (k(vol)) which were calculated in this work. k(gap) quantifies the effect of the vacuum gaps within the calorimeter on the dose to the core, while k(vol) accounts for the difference between the measurements of dose to the whole core and what is actually required: dose at a point in the centre of the core. Methods: A simplified model of the calorimeter was created in TOPAS (a Monte Carlo particle transport simulation software based on the GEANT4 toolkit) and simulations were run at five different monoenergetic beam energies (60, 100, 150, 190 & 230 MeV). For the k(gap) correction factor, the simplified calorimeter model was compared to a compensated model of the calorimeter where the graphite components were shifted towards the beam until they touch and then the vacuum gaps were replaced with graphite. For the k(vol) correction factor the dose in the core of the calorimeter was compared to the dose in a small volume (0.25 mm radius) in the centre of the core. Results: The gap correction factor, k(gap), had a non-linear dependence on energy, ranging from 0.06% above unity at 60 MeV to 0.36% above unity at 230 MeV. The volume averaging correction factor was found to be negligible, with an uncertainty of 0.065%. Conclusions: The gap correction factor and volume averaging correction factor, along with their associated uncertainties have been calculated. These correction factors are essential in establishing the calorimeter as a primary standard.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 385
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Monte Carlo and water calorimetric determination of kilovoltage beam radiotherapy ionization chamber correction factors
    Bancheri, Julien
    Ketelhut, Steffen
    Buermann, Ludwig
    Seuntjens, Jan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (10)
  • [22] Determination of small field output factors and correction factors using a Monte Carlo method for a 1000 MU/min CyberKnife® system equipped with fixed collimators
    Moignier, C.
    Huet, C.
    Barraux, V.
    Bassinet, C.
    Baumann, M.
    Sebe-Mercier, K.
    Loiseau, C.
    Batalla, A.
    Makovicka, L.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2014, 71 : 287 - 292
  • [23] Monte Carlo-calculated beam quality and perturbation correction factors validated against experiments for Farmer and Markus type ionization chambers in therapeutic carbon-ion beams
    Urago, Yuka
    Sakama, Makoto
    Sakata, Dousatsu
    Fukuda, Shigekazu
    Katayose, Tetsurou
    Chang, Weishan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (18)
  • [24] Water equivalence of various materials for clinical proton dosimetry by experiment and Monte Carlo simulation
    Al-Sulaiti, Leena
    Shipley, David
    Thomas, Russell
    Kacperek, Andrzej
    Regan, Patrick
    Palmans, Hugo
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2010, 619 (1-3) : 344 - 347
  • [25] Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality
    Malkov, Victor N.
    Rogers, D. W. O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (02) : 908 - 925
  • [26] Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors for PTW cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams
    Gimenez-Alventosa, Vicent
    Gimenez, Vicente
    Ballester, Facundo
    Vijande, Javier
    Andreo, Pedro
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (20)
  • [27] A Fano cavity test for Monte Carlo proton transport algorithms
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Sorriaux, Jefferson
    Souris, Kevin
    Vynckier, Stefaan
    Bouchard, Hugo
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (01)
  • [28] Monte Carlo simulation of a proton therapy beamline for intracranial treatments
    Sayah, R.
    Donadille, L.
    Aube, A.
    Herault, J.
    Delacroix, S.
    De Marzi, L.
    Stichelbaut, F.
    Clairand, I.
    RADIOPROTECTION, 2013, 48 (03) : 317 - 339
  • [29] KLOE Calorimeter Simulation with Virtual Monte Carlo
    Roukoutakis, Filimon
    2010 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2010, : 1146 - 1148
  • [30] Systematic uncertainties in the Monte Carlo calculation of ion chamber replacement correction factors
    Wang, L. L. W.
    La Russa, D. J.
    Rogers, D. W. O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (05) : 1785 - 1789