Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for the NPL proton calorimeter

被引:1
|
作者
Petrie, L. M. [1 ,2 ]
Galer, S. [1 ]
Shipley, D. [1 ]
Palmans, H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, Radiat Dosimetry Grp, Teddington, Middx, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
[3] EBG MedAustron GmbH, Dept Med Phys, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Monte Carlo; TOPAS; Dosimetry; Correction factors; Calorimeter; Primary standards; STANDARDS; DOSIMETRY; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.12.014
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Introduction: The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) proton graphite calorimeter is a primary standard level instrument, capable of determining absorbed dose for proton beam radiotherapy dosimetry in the UK. In order to obtain the absorbed dose from the calorimeter measurement data, various correction factors need to be applied, including the gap correction factor (k(gap)) and the volume averaging correction factor (k(vol)) which were calculated in this work. k(gap) quantifies the effect of the vacuum gaps within the calorimeter on the dose to the core, while k(vol) accounts for the difference between the measurements of dose to the whole core and what is actually required: dose at a point in the centre of the core. Methods: A simplified model of the calorimeter was created in TOPAS (a Monte Carlo particle transport simulation software based on the GEANT4 toolkit) and simulations were run at five different monoenergetic beam energies (60, 100, 150, 190 & 230 MeV). For the k(gap) correction factor, the simplified calorimeter model was compared to a compensated model of the calorimeter where the graphite components were shifted towards the beam until they touch and then the vacuum gaps were replaced with graphite. For the k(vol) correction factor the dose in the core of the calorimeter was compared to the dose in a small volume (0.25 mm radius) in the centre of the core. Results: The gap correction factor, k(gap), had a non-linear dependence on energy, ranging from 0.06% above unity at 60 MeV to 0.36% above unity at 230 MeV. The volume averaging correction factor was found to be negligible, with an uncertainty of 0.065%. Conclusions: The gap correction factor and volume averaging correction factor, along with their associated uncertainties have been calculated. These correction factors are essential in establishing the calorimeter as a primary standard.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 385
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams - deriving uncertainties from published data
    Baumann, Kilian-Simon
    Goma, Carles
    Wulff, Joerg
    Kretschmer, Jana
    Zink, Klemens
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 113
  • [2] Monte Carlo calculated fluence correction factors in PMMA and polystyrene phantoms in clinical proton beams
    Palmans, H
    Vynckier, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 872 - 875
  • [3] Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4
    Baumann, Kilian-Simon
    Kaupa, Sina
    Bach, Constantin
    Engenhart-Cabillic, Rita
    Zink, Klemens
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (05)
  • [4] Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy electron beams
    Alissa, Mohamad
    Zink, Klemens
    Roeser, Arnd
    Flatten, Veronika
    Schoenfeld, Andreas A.
    Czarnecki, Damian
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 117
  • [5] Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy photon and electron fields
    Czarnecki, Damian
    Zink, Klemens
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 131
  • [6] IPEM code of practice for proton therapy dosimetry based on the NPL primary standard proton calorimeter calibration service
    Green, Stuart
    Lourenco, Ana
    Palmans, Hugo
    Lee, Nigel
    Amos, Richard A.
    Souza, Derek D'
    Fiorini, Francesca
    van den Heuvel, Frank
    Kacperek, Andrzej
    Mackay, Ranald
    Pettingell, John
    Thomas, Russell
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2025, 70 (06)
  • [7] Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams
    Kretschmer, Jana
    Dulkys, Anna
    Brodbek, Leonie
    Stelljes, Tenzin Sonam
    Looe, Hui Khee
    Poppe, Bjoern
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (11) : 5890 - 5905
  • [8] Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT
    Baumann, Kilian-Simon
    Kaupa, Sina
    Bach, Constantin
    Engenhart-Cabillic, Rita
    Zink, Klemens
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2021, 31 (02): : 175 - 191
  • [9] Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for the PTW microDiamond detector in the Gamma Knife-Model C
    Barrett, J. C.
    Knill, Cory
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (03) : 1035 - 1044
  • [10] Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams
    Alissa, Mohamad
    Zink, Klemens
    Tessier, Frederic
    Schoenfeld, Andreas A.
    Czarnecki, Damian
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 94 : 17 - 23