Real-Time Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination for LEO Satellites Using Zero-Differenced Ambiguity Resolution

被引:26
作者
Li, Xingxing [1 ]
Wu, Jiaqi [1 ]
Zhang, Keke [1 ]
Li, Xin [1 ]
Xiong, Yun [1 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
kinematic orbit; zero-differenced ambiguity resolution; real-time processing; Sentinel-3; swarm; BASE-LINES; GPS; SWARM; GRACE; PPP;
D O I
10.3390/rs11232815
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rapid growing number of earth observation missions and commercial low-earth-orbit (LEO) constellation plans have provided a strong motivation to get accurate LEO satellite position and velocity information in real time. This paper is devoted to improve the real-time kinematic LEO orbits through fixing the zero-differenced (ZD) ambiguities of onboard Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) phase observations. In the proposed method, the real-time uncalibrated phase delays (UPDs) are estimated epoch-by-epoch via a global-distributed network to support the ZD ambiguity resolution (AR) for LEO satellites. By separating the UPDs, the ambiguities of onboard ZD GPS phase measurements recover their integer nature. Then, wide-lane (WL) and narrow-lane (NL) AR are performed epoch-by-epoch and the real-time ambiguity-fixed orbits are thus obtained. To validate the proposed method, a real-time kinematic precise orbit determination (POD), for both Sentinel-3A and Swarm-A satellites, was carried out with ambiguity-fixed and ambiguity-float solutions, respectively. The ambiguity fixing results indicate that, for both Sentinel-3A and Swarm-A, over 90% ZD ambiguities could be properly fixed with the time to first fix (TTFF) around 25-30 min. For the assessment of LEO orbits, the differences with post-processed reduced dynamic orbits and satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals are investigated. Compared with the ambiguity-float solution, the 3D orbit difference root mean square (RMS) values reduce from 7.15 to 5.23 cm for Sentinel-3A, and from 5.29 to 4.01 cm for Swarm-A with the help of ZD AR. The SLR residuals also show notable improvements for an ambiguity-fixed solution; the standard deviation values of Sentinel-3A and Swarm-A are 4.01 and 2.78 cm, with improvements of over 20% compared with the ambiguity-float solution. In addition, the phase residuals of ambiguity-fixed solution are 0.5-1.0 mm larger than those of the ambiguity-float solution; the possible reason is that the ambiguity fixing separate integer ambiguities from unmodeled errors used to be absorbed in float ambiguities.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Relative positioning of formation-flying spacecraft using single-receiver GPS carrier phase ambiguity fixing [J].
Allende-Alba, Gerardo ;
Montenbruck, Oliver ;
Hackel, Stefan ;
Tossaint, Michel .
GPS SOLUTIONS, 2018, 22 (03)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, J GEODESY, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00190-018-1195-2
[3]   Satellite laser ranging to low Earth orbiters: orbit and network validation [J].
Arnold, Daniel ;
Montenbruck, Oliver ;
Hackel, Stefan ;
Sosnica, Krzysztof .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2019, 93 (11) :2315-2334
[4]   A reassessment of global and regional mean sea level trends from TOPEX and Jason-1 altimetry based on revised reference frame and orbits [J].
Beckley, B. D. ;
Lemoine, F. G. ;
Luthcke, S. B. ;
Ray, R. D. ;
Zelensky, N. P. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (14)
[5]   Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data [J].
Bertiger, Willy ;
Desai, Shailen D. ;
Haines, Bruce ;
Harvey, Nate ;
Moore, Angelyn W. ;
Owen, Susan ;
Weiss, Jan P. .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2010, 84 (05) :327-337
[6]   Gravity field models from kinematic orbits of CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE satellites [J].
Bezdek, Ales ;
Sebera, Josef ;
Klokocnik, Jaroslav ;
Kostelecky, Jan .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (03) :412-429
[7]   CARRIER PHASE AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION FOR THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM APPLIED TO GEODETIC BASELINES UP TO 2000 KM [J].
BLEWITT, G .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1989, 94 (B8) :10187-10203
[8]   Precision Orbit Determination Standards for the Jason Series of Altimeter Missions [J].
Cerri, L. ;
Berthias, J. P. ;
Bertiger, W. I. ;
Haines, B. J. ;
Lemoine, F. G. ;
Mercier, F. ;
Ries, J. C. ;
Willis, P. ;
Zelensky, N. P. ;
Ziebart, M. .
MARINE GEODESY, 2010, 33 :379-418
[9]  
Collins P, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 NATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION - NTM 2008, P720
[10]  
de Selding P.B., 2015, SPACE NEWS WEBSITE, V19