Long-Term Benefit Perception, Complications, and Device Malfunction Rate of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation for Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss

被引:41
作者
Gluth, Michael B.
Eager, Katrise M.
Eikelboom, Robert H.
Atlas, Marcus D.
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Surg, Ear Sci Ctr, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Ear Sci Inst Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Hearing aid; Sensorineural hearing loss; Titanium implant; INNER-EAR DEAFNESS; SKIN REACTIONS; BAHA; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f0c53e
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To longitudinally evaluate short-and long-term subject satisfaction/benefit perception, device usage rates, complication rates, and external device repair rates of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation on a cohort of adult subjects with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (PUSHL). Study Design: Prospective clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Fifty-six adults with PUSHL, 21 of which underwent BAHA implantation (followed for an average of 3.2 years after implantation; range, 0.8-4.6 yr). Main Outcome Measures: Short-and long-term satisfaction/benefit perception outcomes consisting of the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and Single-Sided Deafness Questionnaire, including a comparison of results between implanted and nonimplanted subjects. Short-and long-term device usage rates, complications, and device failure issues also were carefully documented. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in nearly all measures of benefit perception documented as well as a high rate of long-term device usage (81%). Although satisfaction and benefit perception outcomes generally tended to regress over time when compared with initial short-term outcomes, long-term scores still tended to be significantly improved nevertheless as compared with preoperative levels. Approximately 38% of implants experienced severe local skin reactions (Grade 2 and above) around the implant site at some point throughout the follow-up period, whereas only one (4.8%) required implant removal. 66.7% of subjects required repair of their external sound processor. Conclusion: BAHA implantation seems to provide a high level of short-and long-term perceived benefit and satisfaction in subjects with PUSHL and high rate of long-term device usage. Implant site adverse local skin reactions and repairs of the external sound processor were quite common.
引用
收藏
页码:1427 / 1434
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: A 14-year experience
    Badran, Khaled
    Bunstone, Dan
    Arya, Arvind K.
    Suryanarayanan, Ranganathan
    Mackinnon, Neil
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) : 659 - 666
  • [2] Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness
    Bosman, AJ
    Hol, MKS
    Snik, AFM
    Mylanus, EAM
    Cremers, CWRJ
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2003, 123 (02) : 258 - 260
  • [3] CHIOSSOINEKERDE.JA, 2000, OTOL NEUROTOL, V21, P645
  • [4] Clinical Outcome of the Simplified Surgical Technique for BAHA Implantation
    de Wolf, Maarten J. F.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Huygen, Patrick L. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Cremers, Cor W. R. J.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (08) : 1100 - 1108
  • [5] Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implant Location in Relation to Skin Reactions
    Faber, Hubert T.
    de Wolf, Maarten J. F.
    de Rooy, Jacky W. J.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Cremers, Cor W. R. J.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2009, 135 (08) : 742 - 747
  • [6] Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: An evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements
    Hol, MKS
    Bosman, AJ
    Snik, AFM
    Mylanus, EAM
    Cremers, CWRJ
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) : 999 - 1006
  • [7] Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: A study of 20 patients
    Hol, MKS
    Bosman, AJ
    Snik, AFM
    Mylanus, EAM
    Cremers, CWRJ
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2004, 9 (05) : 274 - 281
  • [8] The bone-anchored hearing aid - Quality-of-life assessment
    Hol, MKS
    Spath, MA
    Krabbe, PFM
    van der Pouw, CTM
    Snik, AFM
    Cremers, CWRJ
    Mylanus, EAM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2004, 130 (04) : 394 - 399
  • [9] HOLGERS KM, 1988, AM J OTOL, V9, P56
  • [10] Bone-anchored hearing aids: Incidence and management of postoperative complications
    House, John W.
    Kutz, Joe Walter, Jr.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (02) : 213 - 217