Paired structures in knowledge representation

被引:23
|
作者
Montero, J. [1 ,2 ]
Bustince, H. [3 ]
Franco, C. [4 ]
Rodriguez, J. T. [5 ]
Gomez, D. [6 ]
Pagola, M. [3 ]
Fernandez, J. [3 ]
Barrenechea, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Fac Math, Plaza Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Geosci Inst IGEO CSIC UCM, Plaza Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Automat & Computac, Campus Arrosadia S-N, Pamplona 31006, Spain
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, IFRO, Bulowsvej 17, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Univ Complutense, Fac Math, Plaza Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Complutense, Fac Stat, Ave Puerta Hierro S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Knowledge representation; Paired structures; Neutral concepts; Bipolarity; FUZZY-SET THEORY; DECISION-MAKING; TERMINOLOGICAL DIFFICULTIES; COGNITIVE STRUCTURE; BIPOLAR; PREFERENCE; SEMANTICS; DIMENSION; LOGIC; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2016.02.003
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this position paper we propose a consistent and unifying view to all those basic knowledge representation models that are based on the existence of two somehow opposite fuzzy concepts. A number of these basic models can be found in fuzzy logic and multi-valued logic literature. Here it is claimed that it is the semantic relationship between two paired concepts what determines the emergence of different types of neutrality, namely indeterminacy, ambivalence and conflict, widely used under different frameworks (possibly under different names). It will be shown the potential relevance of paired structures, generated from two paired concepts together with their associated neutrality, all of them to be modeled as fuzzy sets. In this way, paired structures can be viewed as a standard basic model from which different models arise. This unifying view should therefore allow a deeper analysis of the relationships between several existing knowledge representation formalisms, providing a basis from which more expressive models can be later developed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 58
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why Knowledge Representation Matters
    Shoham, Yoav
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2016, 59 (01) : 47 - 49
  • [42] Deverbal nouns in knowledge representation
    Gurevich, Olga
    Crouch, Richard
    King, Tracy Holloway
    de Paiva, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 18 (03) : 385 - 404
  • [43] FORMALISMS FOR GRAMMATICAL KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION
    KELLER, B
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 1992, 6 (04) : 365 - 381
  • [44] Knowledge representation and management in ACTIVEMATH
    Melis, E
    Büdenbender, J
    Goguadze, G
    Libbrecht, P
    Ullrich, C
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2003, 38 (1-3) : 47 - 64
  • [45] A Brief Survey on Forgetting from a Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Perspective
    Thomas Eiter
    Gabriele Kern-Isberner
    KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2019, 33 : 9 - 33
  • [46] A Brief Survey on Forgetting from a Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Perspective
    Eiter, Thomas
    Kern-Isberner, Gabriele
    KUNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ, 2019, 33 (01): : 9 - 33
  • [47] Knowledge Representation of Natural Language in High Performance Linguistics Scheme
    Suryanarayana, D.
    Kanakam, Prathyusha
    Hussain, S. Mahaboob
    Gupta, Sumit
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2016, : 139 - 143
  • [48] Dynamic Adaptive Fuzzy Petri Nets for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Lin, Qing-Lian
    Mao, Ling-Xiang
    Zhang, Zhi-Ying
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2013, 43 (06): : 1399 - 1410
  • [49] On the Logical Foundations of Compound Predicate Formulae for Legal Knowledge Representation
    Hajime Yoshino
    Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1997, 5 (1-2) : 77 - 96
  • [50] A New Class of Fuzzy Petri Nets for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
    Suraj, Zbigniew
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2013, 128 (1-2) : 193 - 207