Paired structures in knowledge representation

被引:23
|
作者
Montero, J. [1 ,2 ]
Bustince, H. [3 ]
Franco, C. [4 ]
Rodriguez, J. T. [5 ]
Gomez, D. [6 ]
Pagola, M. [3 ]
Fernandez, J. [3 ]
Barrenechea, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Fac Math, Plaza Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Geosci Inst IGEO CSIC UCM, Plaza Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Automat & Computac, Campus Arrosadia S-N, Pamplona 31006, Spain
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, IFRO, Bulowsvej 17, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Univ Complutense, Fac Math, Plaza Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Complutense, Fac Stat, Ave Puerta Hierro S-N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Knowledge representation; Paired structures; Neutral concepts; Bipolarity; FUZZY-SET THEORY; DECISION-MAKING; TERMINOLOGICAL DIFFICULTIES; COGNITIVE STRUCTURE; BIPOLAR; PREFERENCE; SEMANTICS; DIMENSION; LOGIC; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2016.02.003
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this position paper we propose a consistent and unifying view to all those basic knowledge representation models that are based on the existence of two somehow opposite fuzzy concepts. A number of these basic models can be found in fuzzy logic and multi-valued logic literature. Here it is claimed that it is the semantic relationship between two paired concepts what determines the emergence of different types of neutrality, namely indeterminacy, ambivalence and conflict, widely used under different frameworks (possibly under different names). It will be shown the potential relevance of paired structures, generated from two paired concepts together with their associated neutrality, all of them to be modeled as fuzzy sets. In this way, paired structures can be viewed as a standard basic model from which different models arise. This unifying view should therefore allow a deeper analysis of the relationships between several existing knowledge representation formalisms, providing a basis from which more expressive models can be later developed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 58
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Context in Ontology for Knowledge Representation
    Chebba, Asmaa
    Bouabana-Tebibel, Thouraya
    Rubin, Stuart H.
    ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 358 : 311 - 320
  • [32] Folksonomy: knowledge representation system?
    Brandt, Mariana
    Basilio Medeiros, Marisa Brascher
    TRANSINFORMACAO, 2010, 22 (02): : 111 - 121
  • [33] Standard model of knowledge representation
    Yin, Wensheng
    FRONTIERS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 11 (03) : 275 - 288
  • [34] Considerations on conceptual knowledge representation
    Porwolik, Marek
    Mulawka, Jan
    PHOTONICS APPLICATIONS IN ASTRONOMY, COMMUNICATIONS, INDUSTRY, AND HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS EXPERIMENTS 2011, 2011, 8008
  • [35] On information and knowledge representation in the brain
    Wang, YX
    Liu, D
    SECOND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFORMATICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 26 - 31
  • [36] On a categorial aspect of knowledge representation
    Tataj, Emanuel
    Mulawka, Jan
    Nieznanski, Edward
    PHOTONICS APPLICATIONS IN ASTRONOMY, COMMUNICATIONS, INDUSTRY, AND HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS EXPERIMENTS 2012, 2012, 8454
  • [37] Knowledge Representation with Autonomic Ontologies
    Brandao, Stainam
    Oliveira, Jonice
    Souza, Jano
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2010 WORKSHOPS, 2010, 6428 : 635 - +
  • [38] Standard model of knowledge representation
    Wensheng Yin
    Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 11 : 275 - 288
  • [39] The OAR model for knowledge representation
    Wang, Yingxu
    2006 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vols 1-5, 2006, : 1988 - 1991
  • [40] Knowledge Representation and Management in ACTIVEMATH
    Erica The ACTIVEMATH group
    Jochen Melis
    George Büdenbender
    Paul Goguadze
    Carsten Libbrecht
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2003, 38 : 47 - 64