Economic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents

被引:53
作者
Shrive, FM
Manns, BJ
Galbraith, PD
Knudtson, ML
Ghali, WA
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Ctr Hlth & Policy Studies, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Div Cardiol, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.1041062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sirolimus-eluting stents have recently been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis among patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given that sirolimus-eluting stents cost about 4 times as much as conventional stents, and considering the volume of PCI procedures, the decision to use sirolimus-eluting stents has large economic implications. Methods: We performed an economic evaluation comparing treatment with sirolimus-eluting and conventional stents in patients undergoing PCI and in subgroups based on age and diabetes mellitus status. The probabilities of transition between clinical states and estimates of resource use and health-related quality of life were derived from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease ( APPROACH) database. Information on effectiveness was based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing sirolimus-eluting and conventional stents. Results: Cost per quality-adjusted life year ( QALY) gained in the baseline analysis was Can$ 58 721. Sirolimus-eluting stents were more cost-effective in patients with diabetes and in those over 75 years of age, the costs per QALY gained being $ 44 135 and $ 40 129, respectively. The results were sensitive to plausible variations in the cost of stents, the estimate of the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents and the assumption that sirolimus-eluting stents would prevent the need for cardiac catheterizations in the subsequent year when no revascularization procedure was performed to treat restenosis. Interpretation: The use of sirolimus-eluting stents is associated with a cost per QALY that is similar to or higher than that of other accepted medical forms of therapy and is associated with a significant incremental cost. Sirolimus-eluting stents are more economically attractive for patients who are at higher risk of restenosis or at a high risk of death if a second revascularization procedure were to be required.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] *CCOHTA, 1997, GUID EC EV PHARM, P4
  • [2] Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: Perspectives from multicenter clinical trials
    Cutlip, DE
    Chauhan, MS
    Baim, DS
    Ho, KKL
    Popma, JJ
    Carrozza, JP
    Cohen, DJ
    Kuntz, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (12) : 2082 - 2089
  • [3] Ghali WA, 2000, CAN J CARDIOL, V16, P1225
  • [4] Myocardial perfusion imaging following percutaneous coronary intervention - The importance of restenosis, disease progression, and directed reintervention
    Giedd, KN
    Bergmann, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (03) : 328 - 336
  • [5] Do hospitals with low mortality rates in coronary artery bypass also perform well in valve replacement?
    Goodney, PP
    O'Connor, GT
    Wennberg, DE
    Birkmeyer, JD
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (04) : 1131 - 1136
  • [6] Can we afford to eliminate restenosis? Can we afford not to?
    Greenberg, D
    Bakhai, A
    Cohen, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (04) : 513 - 518
  • [7] *HARV SCH PUBL HLT, CEA REG STAND METH P
  • [8] Hoerger TJ, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V287, P2542
  • [9] Jamal SM, 2003, CAN J CARDIOL, V19, P782
  • [10] *JOHNS JOHNS CORD, 2003, REIMB COD GUID DRUG