Clinical Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Anastomosis for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

被引:6
作者
Ma, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Mingzuo [2 ]
Wang, Jian [2 ]
Pan, Haixing [2 ]
Wu, Jianqiang [2 ]
Xing, Chungen [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, 1055 Sanxiang Rd, Suzhou 215004, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Suqian Hosp, Suqian, Peoples R China
关键词
Adenocarcinoma; Esophagogastric junction; Gastrectomy; Reconstructive surgical procedure; Nutritional status; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UPPER; 3RD; III ADENOCARCINOMA; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS; GASTRIC-CANCER; OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e25
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has increased in recent years, and the optimal surgical strategy for AEG remains highly controversial. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DT) for the treatment of patients with AEG. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with Siewert type II/III AEG between January 2013 and July 2018. Clinicopathological characteristics, survival, surgical outcomes, quality of life (QOL), and nutritional status were compared between the PG-DT and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis (TG-RY) groups. Results: After propensity score matching, 33 patients in each group were analyzed. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. The surgical option was not an independent prognostic factor based on the multivariate analysis. In addition, no differences were found in terms of surgical complications. There were no significant differences in QOL assessed by the Visick grade, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, or endoscopic findings. Furthermore, the long-term nutritional advantage of the PG-DT group was significantly greater than that of the TG-RY group. Conclusions: PG-DT is a safe and effective procedure for patients with local Siewert type II/III AEG, regardless of the TNM stage.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 234
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
    Xu, Zhiwen
    Chen, Jinping
    Chen, Shaoqin
    Lin, Hexin
    Zhao, Kang
    Zheng, Changyue
    Liu, Huibin
    Chen, Zhihua
    Fu, Yongan
    Hong, Qingqi
    Lin, Wei
    Yan, Su
    You, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [22] The length of proximal margin does not influence the prognosis of Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after transhiatal curative gastrectomy
    Feng, Fan
    Tian, Yangzi
    Xu, Guanghui
    Liu, Shushang
    Liu, Zhen
    Zheng, Gaozan
    Guo, Man
    Lian, Xiao
    Fan, Daiming
    Zhang, Hongwei
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [23] Comparison Between Billroth-II with Braun and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy
    Choi, Chang In
    Baek, Dong Hoon
    Lee, Si Hak
    Hwang, Sun Hwi
    Kim, Dae Hwan
    Kim, Kwang Ha
    Jeon, Tae Yong
    Kim, Dong Heon
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (06) : 1083 - 1090
  • [24] Comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted and open total gastrectomy for Siewert Types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
    Wang, Jianchu
    Wang, Jin-Cheng
    Song, Bin
    Dai, Xu-Dong
    Zhang, Xiao-Yu
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 234 (07) : 11235 - 11239
  • [25] A Comparison of the Short-Term Clinical Effects Between Totally Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy With Modified Roux-en-Y Anastomosis and Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Anastomosis
    Zhu, Guangsheng
    Hu, Junjie
    Lu, Li
    Wei, Shaozhong
    Xiong, Zhiguo
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2020, 19
  • [26] Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy After Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: Comparison With Billorth II Reconstruction
    Shim, Jung Ho
    Oh, Seong Il
    Yoo, Han Mo
    Jeon, Hae Myung
    Park, Cho Hyun
    Song, Kyo Young
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (05) : 448 - 451
  • [27] Functional jejunal interposition versus Roux-en-Y anastomosis after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective randomized clinical trial
    Wang, Huashe
    Hu, Xiansheng
    Chen, Shi
    Xiang, Jun
    Yang, Zuli
    Zhou, Zhiwei
    Chen, Yingbo
    Lin, Yijia
    Chen, Yonghe
    Peng, Junsheng
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 34 : 236 - 244
  • [28] Laparoscopic-assisted versus open proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for Siewert type II-III adenocarcinomas of esophago-gastric junction: a retrospective observational study of short-term outcomes
    Zhang, Bin
    Liu, Riaoyong
    Ma, Fei
    Peng, Liangqun
    Lu, Shuaibing
    Zhang, Yonglei
    Ma, Qi
    Ji, Sheqing
    Zhang, Zhandong
    Chai, Junhui
    Hua, Yawei
    Wang, Hui
    Li, Qian
    Luo, Suxia
    Chen, Xiaobing
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 249 - 258
  • [29] To Roux or not to Roux: a comparison between Roux-en-Y and Billroth II reconstruction following partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Tran, Thuy B.
    Worhunsky, David J.
    Squires, Malcolm H.
    Jin, Linda X.
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Votanopoulos, Konstantinos I.
    Cho, Clifford S.
    Weber, Sharon M.
    Schmidt, Carl
    Levine, Edward A.
    Bloomston, Mark
    Fields, Ryan C.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Norton, Jeffrey A.
    Poultsides, George A.
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2016, 19 (03) : 994 - 1001
  • [30] Long-term results of hand-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced Siewert type II and type III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Xuedong
    Xue, Huanzhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 53 : 201 - 205