A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): Identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach

被引:561
作者
Sung, Gi-Ho [1 ]
Sung, Jae-Mo
Hywel-Jones, Nigel L.
Spatafora, Joseph W.
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Bot & Plant Pathol, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Appl Biol, Chunchon 200701, South Korea
[3] Natl Ctr Genet Engn & Biotechnol, Mycol Lab, Pathum Thani, Thailand
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bayesian; mtATP6; parsimony; partitioned Bremer support; RPB1; RPB2; systematics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses were conducted to address the evolution of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota). Data are presented here for approximately 5900 base pairs from portions of seven loci: the nuclear ribosomal small and large subunit DNA (nr SSU and nr LSO, ss-tubulin, elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1 alpha), the largest and second largest subunits of RNA polymerase 11 (RPB1 and RPB2), and mitochondrial ATP Synthase subunit 6 (mtATP6). These data were analyzed in a complete 66-taxon matrix and 91-taxon supermatrix that included some missing data. Separate phylogenetic analyses, with data partitioned according to genes, produced some conflicting results. The results of separate analyses from RPB1 and RPB2 are in agreement with the combined analyses that resolve a paraphyletic Clavicipitaceae comprising three well-supported clades (i.e., Clavicipitaceae clade A, B, and Q, whereas the tree obtained from mtATP6 is in strong conflict with the monophyly of Clavicipitaceae clade B and the sister-group relationship of Hypocreaceae and Clavicipitaceae clade C. The distribution of relative contribution of nodal support for each gene partition was assessed using both partitioned Bremer support (PBS) values and combinational bootstrap (CB) analyses, the latter of which analyzed bootstrap proportions from all possible combinations of the seven gene partitions. These results suggest that CB analyses provide a more consistent estimate of nodal support than PBS and that combining heterogeneous gene partitions, which individually support a limited number of nodes, results in increased support for overall tree topology. Analyses of the 91-taxa supermatrix data sets revealed that some nodes were more strongly supported by increased taxon sampling. Identifying the localized incongruence of mtATP6 and analyses of complete and supermatrix data sets strengthen the evidence for rejecting the monophyly of Clavicipitaceae and much of the current subfamilial classification of the family. Although the monophyly of the grass-associated subfamily Clavicipitoideae (e.g., Claviceps, Balansia, and Epichloe) is strongly supported, the subfamily Cordycipitoideae (e.g., Cordyceps and Torrubiella) is not monophyletic. In particular, species of the genus Cordyceps, which are pathogens of arthropods and truffles, are found in all three clavicipitaceous clades. These results imply that most characters used in the current familial classification of Clavicipitaceae are not diagnostic of monophyly. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1223
页数:20
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]   Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence [J].
Alfaro, ME ;
Zoller, S ;
Lutzoni, F .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 20 (02) :255-266
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony 4.0 for Macintosh
[4]  
Artjariyasripong Suparp, 2001, Mycoscience, V42, P503, DOI 10.1007/BF02460949
[5]   Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophilids [J].
Baker, RH ;
DeSalle, R .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1997, 46 (04) :654-673
[6]   Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees [J].
Baker, RH ;
Yu, XB ;
DeSalle, R .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 9 (03) :427-436
[7]   The utility of the incongruence length difference test [J].
Barker, FK ;
Lutzoni, FM .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (04) :625-637
[8]   AGAINST CONSENSUS [J].
BARRETT, M ;
DONOGHUE, MJ ;
SOBER, E .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1991, 40 (04) :486-493
[9]  
BRAUM EL, 1994, SYST BIOL, V51, P614
[10]  
BREMER K, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P795, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x