Mixed preferential attachment model: Homophily and minorities in social networks

被引:10
作者
Avin, Chen [1 ]
Daltrophe, Hadassa [2 ]
Keller, Barbara [4 ]
Lotker, Zvi [3 ]
Mathieu, Claire [5 ]
Peleg, David [6 ]
Pignolet, Yvonne-Anne [7 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Shamoon Coll Engn, Software Engn, Ashdod, Israel
[3] Bar Ilan Univ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[4] Aalto Univ, Espoo, Finland
[5] CNRS, Paris, France
[6] Weizmann Inst Sci, Comp Sci & Appl Math, Rehovot, Israel
[7] DFINITY, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Homophily; Preferential attachment; Social networks; Power law; Minority-majority; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2020.124723
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Individuals in social networks tend to exhibit homophily in their social ties, namely, they prefer bonding with others of the same social group (e.g., the same nationality, gender, socio-economic background, etc.). To formalize this phenomenon in the context of an evolving social network, we consider a mixed preferential attachment (MPA), bipopulated, network model. In this model each of the two social groups has a certain level of bias applied by its members toward other group members, ranging form homophily (affinity toward the same) to heterophily (affinity toward the different). Thus, the MPA model supports the following three simple and well-accepted observations on human behavior related to forming networks: (i) the "rich get richer'' mechanism, (ii) heterogeneity and a resulting minority-majority partition, and (iii) selection bias between groups. The main contribution of this paper is to propose a model for the evolution of a social network under these three assumptions and analyze its behavior. We show that the suggested mixed preferential attachment model exhibits, for each population, a (possibly different) power law degree distribution, i.e., a distribution where the fraction of nodes with degree k is proportional to k(-beta) (note that beta may be different for each group, as a function of the bias level and the minority-majority partition). We believe that this model may contribute to a better understanding of the forces that shape the groups and communities of our society. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Alon N., 2004, PROBABILISTIC METHOD
  • [2] [Anonymous], COM ADAP SY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1954, Freedom and control in modern society, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8705.2012.02056_3.X
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, SOCIAL EC NETWORKS
  • [5] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [6] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [7] Homophily and the Glass Ceiling Effect in Social Networks
    Avin, Chen
    Keller, Barbara
    Lotker, Zvi
    Mathieu, Claire
    Peleg, David
    Pignolet, Yvonne-Anne
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INNOVATIONS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE (ITCS'15), 2015, : 41 - 50
  • [8] Emergence of scaling in random networks
    Barabási, AL
    Albert, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) : 509 - 512
  • [9] Basu S, 2003, PROG INFLAM RES, P33
  • [10] Bock S., 2013, ISSUES INFORM SYSTEM, V14, P143