Identifying Entrepreneurial Competencies Using Q Methodology: An Innovative Research Approach

被引:0
作者
Phelan, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Lincoln, England
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM 2015) | 2015年
关键词
Q methodology; subjectivity; entrepreneurial competencies; farm diversification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper introduces Q Methodology as a technique for the study of human subjectivity and in particular individual beliefs, values, opinions and attitudes. Originating in the discipline of psychology (Stephenson, 1953), Q Methodology remains a relatively unknown and underutilised technique across other disciplines. Moreover, where it does occur, it is frequently described as an innovative research approach (Stergiou and Airey, 2011; Massingham, Massingham and Diment, 2012). Here, the six key stages within a Q Methdological study are introduced, and are explored in the context of an illustrative Q study which sought to identify the entrepreneurial competencies of UK farmers who have diversified all, or part, of their agricultural operations to farm based tourism and recreation (Phelan, 2014). Thus, the aim of this paper is to demonstrate how Q Methodology works in a practical setting with the literature on Q Methodology reviewed and discussed in tandem with the research findings. In outlining this research design, this paper highlights that Q Methodology embraces a hybridity of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. However, at its core, lies a rejection of hypothetico-deductive methods, and as such, it remains a social constructionist and largely qualitative method. Moreover, this paper demonstrates that Q has much to offer business and management researchers in heeding the call for greater methodological pluralism.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 330
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Ainley S., 2011, P 42 TRAV TOUR RES A
  • [2] Moving beyond positivism: reflexive collaboration in understanding agritourism across North American boundaries
    Ainley, Suzanne
    Kline, Carol
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2014, 17 (05) : 404 - 413
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and inter-pretation, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446251911
  • [4] Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology
    Barry, J
    Proops, J
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (03) : 337 - 345
  • [5] Brown S.R., 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVITY: APPLICATIONS OF Q METHODOLOGY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE
  • [6] Brown S.R., 1993, Operant subjectivity, V16, P91, DOI DOI 10.22488/OKSTATE.93.100504
  • [7] Chell Elizabeth., 2000, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V9, P63, DOI DOI 10.1080/135943200398067
  • [8] Davis CharlesH., 2011, Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, V8, P559
  • [9] De Wolf P., 2007, Exploring the significance of entrepreneurship in agriculture
  • [10] Exel VJ., 2005, Q METHODOLOGY SNEAK