Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field

被引:49
作者
Jagielska, Anna [1 ]
Wroblewska, Liliana [1 ]
Skolnick, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Biol, Ctr Study Syst Biol, Atlanta, GA 30318 USA
关键词
amber force field; force field optimization; protein structure prediction; all-atom potential;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0800054105
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One of the greatest challenges in protein structure prediction is the refinement of low-resolution predicted models to high-resolution structures that are close to the native state. Although contemporary structure prediction methods can assemble the correct topology,for a large fraction of protein domains, such approximate models are often not of the resolution required for many important applications, including studies of reaction mechanisms and virtual ligand screening. Thus, the development of a method that could bring those structures closer to the native state is of great importance. We recently optimized the relative weights of the components of the Amber ff03 potential on a large set of decoy structures to create a funnel-shaped energy landscape with the native structure at the global minimum. Such an energy function might be able to drive proteins toward their native structure. In this work, for a test set of 47 proteins, with 100 decoy structures per protein that have a range of structural similarities to the native state, we demonstrate that our optimized potential can drive protein models closer to their native structure. Comparing the lowest-energy structure from each trajectory with the starting decoy, structural improvement is seen for 70% of the models on average. The ability to do such systematic structural refinements by using a physics-based all-atom potential represents a promising approach to high-resolution structure prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:8268 / 8273
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Protein structure prediction and structural genomics [J].
Baker, D ;
Sali, A .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5540) :93-96
[2]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[3]   Efficient Monte Carlo trial moves for polypeptide simulations [J].
Betancourt, MR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 123 (17)
[4]   Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins [J].
Bradley, P ;
Misura, KMS ;
Baker, D .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5742) :1868-1871
[5]   Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? [J].
Chen, Jianhan ;
Brooks, Charles L., III .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 67 (04) :922-930
[6]  
Csendes T., 1988, Acta Cybernetica, V8, P361
[7]   A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations [J].
Duan, Y ;
Wu, C ;
Chowdhury, S ;
Lee, MC ;
Xiong, GM ;
Zhang, W ;
Yang, R ;
Cieplak, P ;
Luo, R ;
Lee, T ;
Caldwell, J ;
Wang, JM ;
Kollman, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 24 (16) :1999-2012
[8]   Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques [J].
Fan, H ;
Mark, AE .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2004, 13 (01) :211-220
[9]   3D-SHOTGUN: A novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor [J].
Fischer, D .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 51 (03) :434-441
[10]   Practical lessons from protein structure prediction [J].
Ginalski, K ;
Grishin, NV ;
Godzik, A ;
Rychlewski, L .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (06) :1874-1891