What hinders team innovation performance? Three-way interaction of destructive leadership, intra-team conflict, and organizational diversity

被引:4
作者
Choi, Suk Bong [1 ]
Jung, Ki Baek [1 ]
Kang, Seung-Wan [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Global Business, Sejong City, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Coll Business, Seongnam, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
destructive leadership; intra-team conflict; organizational diversity; innovation performance; three-way interaction; DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY; WORK GROUP DIVERSITY; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; MODERATING ROLE; CURVILINEAR RELATIONSHIP; SHARED LEADERSHIP; RACIAL DIVERSITY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; JOB-SATISFACTION; GROUP LONGEVITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879412
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper aims to clarify the impact of destructive leadership on team innovation performance. It also explores the relevant conditions that maximize the above relationship. Specifically we examine how intra-team conflict organizational diversity moderate the relationship between destructive leadership team innovation performance. Finally the three-way interaction between destructive leadership intra-team conflict organizational diversity is analyzed for the worst conditions to maximize the negative effect of destructive leadership on team innovation performance. This paper used a cross-sectional design with questionnaires administered to 87 teams with 479 team members working in Korean manufacturing service firms. It applied a hierarchical regression analysis to test the hypothesized relationships including three-way interaction effect among destructive leadership intra-team conflict organizational diversity on team innovation performance. This paper provided empirical insights about how destructive behaviors of team leader hindered team innovation performance. The three-way interaction effects also revealed that the higher the levels of both intra-team conflict organizational diversity the greater the negative effect of destructive leadership on team innovation performance. This paper demonstrates how team leaders' behavior team organizational conditions result in discouraging overall innovation outcomes. This paper contributes to the innovation leadership literatures by identifying possible leadership type hindering innovation performance at team level the specific conditions their dynamic interaction strengthening the negative effect of destructive leadership on team innovation performance.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 172 条
[1]   Empirical analysis of shared leadership promotion and team creativity: An adaptive leadership perspective [J].
Ali, Ahsan ;
Wang, Hongwei ;
Johnson, Russell E. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 41 (05) :405-423
[2]   DEMOGRAPHY AND DESIGN - PREDICTORS OF NEW PRODUCT TEAM PERFORMANCE [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :321-341
[3]   The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science [J].
Anderson, N ;
De Dreu, CKW ;
Nijstad, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) :147-173
[4]  
Anderson N., 2001, HDB IND WORK ORG PSY
[5]   Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status [J].
Aquino, K ;
Douglas, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 90 (01) :195-208
[6]   Information Quality in Wikipedia: The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict [J].
Arazy, Ofer ;
Nov, Oded ;
Patterson, Raymond ;
Yeo, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 27 (04) :71-98
[7]   Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model [J].
Aryee, Samuel ;
Chen, Zhen Xiong ;
Sun, Li-Yun ;
Debrah, Yaw A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (01) :191-201
[8]  
Ashforth BE, 1997, CAN J ADM SCI, V14, P126
[9]  
Ashkanasy N.M., 2002, INT J ORG BEHAV, V5, P150
[10]   Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas [J].
Axtell, CM ;
Holman, DJ ;
Unsworth, KL ;
Wall, TD ;
Waterson, PE .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 :265-285