Making sense of standardized survey questions: The influence of reference periods and their repetition

被引:15
作者
Igou, ER
Bless, H
Schwarz, N
机构
[1] NYU, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Mannheim, D-6800 Mannheim 1, Germany
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
conversation; reference periods; social cognition;
D O I
10.1080/714041712
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
To provide an informative answer to a question, communicators need to determine its intended meaning which often requires extensive inferences based on contextual information. The current studies test if a given piece of contextual information is more influential when it is unique to the question asked rather than shared by several questions. Two experiments demonstrate that respondents draw on the length of the reference period in interpreting frequency questions. Men the same question is presented with a long reference period (six months), respondents interpret it as pertaining to less frequent and more extreme instances of a behavior than when it is presented with a short reference period (one day). As predicted, however, this influence of the reference period on question interpretation is only observed when the reference period is unique to the target question. Men the same reference period is repeatedly used in multiple questions, its use is no longer considered informative and its influence on question interpretation is eliminated. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   THE INFORMATIVE FUNCTIONS OF RESEARCH PROCEDURES - BIAS AND THE LOGIC OF CONVERSATION [J].
BLESS, H ;
STRACK, F ;
SCHWARZ, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 23 (02) :149-165
[2]  
Bradburn N.M, 1983, ASKING QUESTIONS
[3]  
Clark H.H., 1992, QUESTIONS QUESTIONS, P15
[4]  
Dan Sperbery Deirdre Wilson., 1995, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT
[5]  
Grice H. P., 1975, Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, DOI DOI 10.1163/9789004368811_003
[6]   THE SOCIAL-CONTEXT OF REASONING - CONVERSATIONAL INFERENCE AND RATIONAL JUDGMENT [J].
HILTON, DJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 118 (02) :248-271
[8]  
Norenzayan A, 1999, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P1011, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1011::AID-EJSP974>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-A
[10]   JUDGMENT IN A SOCIAL-CONTEXT - BIASES, SHORTCOMINGS, AND THE LOGIC OF CONVERSATION [J].
SCHWARZ, N .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 26, 1994, 26 :123-162