What does 'good ecological potential' mean, within the European water framework directive?

被引:68
作者
Borja, Angel
Elliott, Michael
机构
[1] AZTI Tecnal, Div Marine Res, Pasaia 20110, Spain
[2] Univ Hull, Inst Estuarine & Coastal Studies, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
COASTAL; RESTORATION; HABITATS; ESTUARY; BAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.09.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The most important objective within the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) is to achieve a 'good ecological status' (GES) for all waters, by 2015. Some methodologies have been developed for assessing GES within natural water bodies, in which the ecological status is a perceived or measured deviation from a reference condition. However, the WFD also consider 'Heavily modified water bodies' (HMWB) (a water body resulted from physical alterations by human activity, which substantially change its hydrogeomorphological character, e.g. a harbour). In implementing the WFD, environmental managers are required to assess the status of HMWBs in terms of achieving 'Good Ecological Potential' (GEP). This contribution defines and studies GEP from an ecological point of view, taking into account some ecological restoration principles. Finally, this contribution gives some guidance on how establish GEP, using as example a harbour within the North East Atlantic. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1564
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EPA841F00003
[2]   Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: A case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain) [J].
Bald, J ;
Borja, A ;
Muxika, I ;
Franco, J ;
Valencia, V .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2005, 50 (12) :1508-1522
[3]   Scientific requirements for ecosystem-based management in the restoration of Chesapeake Bay and Coastal Louisiana [J].
Boesch, DF .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (01) :6-26
[4]   Assessing ecological restoration potentials of Wisconsin (USA) using historical landscape reconstructions [J].
Bolliger, J ;
Schulte, LA ;
Burrows, SN ;
Sickley, TA ;
Mladenoff, DJ .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2004, 12 (01) :124-142
[5]   The new European Marine Strategy Directive: Difficulties, opportunities, and challenges [J].
Borja, A .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2006, 52 (03) :239-242
[6]   The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status [J].
Borja, A ;
Galparsoro, I ;
Solaun, O ;
Muxika, I ;
Tello, EM ;
Uriarte, A ;
Valencia, V .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2006, 66 (1-2) :84-96
[7]   The European water framework directive: A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research [J].
Borja, A .
CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (14) :1768-1783
[8]   Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach [J].
Borja, A ;
Franco, J ;
Valencia, V ;
Bald, J ;
Muxika, I ;
Belzunce, MJ ;
Solaun, O .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2004, 48 (3-4) :209-218
[9]   Long-term recovery of soft-bottom benthos following urban and industrial sewage treatment in the Nervion estuary - (southern Bay of Biscay) [J].
Borja, Angel ;
Muxika, Inigo ;
Franco, Javier .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2006, 313 :43-55
[10]   Organic matter and nutrient inputs to the Humber Estuary, England [J].
Boyes, S ;
Elliott, M .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2006, 53 (1-4) :136-143