Assessment of Mobile Health Apps Using Built-In Smartphone Sensors for Diagnosis and Treatment: Systematic Survey of Apps Listed in International Curated Health App Libraries

被引:60
作者
Baxter, Clarence [1 ,2 ]
Carroll, Julie-Anne [1 ,2 ]
Keogh, Brendan [3 ]
Vandelanotte, Corneel [4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Creat Ind Fac, Digital Media Res Ctr, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia
[4] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Hlth Med & Appl Sci, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
关键词
telehealth; mHealth; smartphone; mobile apps; instrumentation; health care quality; health care access; and health care evaluation; medical informatics; consumer health informatics; physician-patient relations; prescriptions; patient participation; patient-generated health data; diagnostic self evaluation; self-care; self-management; medical device legislation; CARE; TECHNOLOGIES; POCKET; STATE;
D O I
10.2196/16741
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: More than a million health and well-being apps are available from the Apple and Google app stores. Some apps use built-in mobile phone sensors to generate health data. Clinicians and patients can find information regarding safe and effective mobile health (mHealth) apps in third party-curated mHealth app libraries. Objective: These independent Web-based repositories guide app selection from trusted lists, but do they offer apps using ubiquitous, low-cost smartphone sensors to improve health? This study aimed to identify the types of built-in mobile phone sensors used in apps listed on curated health app libraries, the range of health conditions these apps address, and the cross-platform availability of the apps. Methods: This systematic survey reviewed three such repositories (National Health Service Apps Library, AppScript, and MyHealthApps), assessing the availability of apps using built-in mobile phone sensors for the diagnosis or treatment of health conditions. Results: A total of 18 such apps were identified and included in this survey, representing 1.1% (8/699) to 3% (2/76) of all apps offered by the respective libraries examined. About one-third (7/18, 39%) of the identified apps offered cross-platform Apple and Android versions, with a further 50% (9/18) only dedicated to Apple and 11% (2/18) to Android. About one-fourth (4/18, 22%) of the identified apps offered dedicated diagnostic functions, with a majority featuring therapeutic (9/18, 50%) or combined functionality (5/18, 28%). Cameras, touch screens, and microphones were the most frequently used built-in sensors. Health concerns addressed by these apps included respiratory, dermatological, neurological, and anxiety conditions. Conclusions: Diligent mHealth app library curation, medical device regulation constraints, and cross-platform differences in mobile phone sensor architectures may all contribute to the observed limited availability of mHealth apps using built-in phone sensors in curated mHealth app libraries. However, more efforts are needed to increase the number of such apps on curated lists, as they offer easily accessible low-cost options to assist people in managing clinical conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Agu E, 2013, 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF INTERNET-OF-THINGS NETWORKING AND CONTROL (IOT-NC), P48, DOI 10.1109/IoT-NC.2013.6694053
[2]   Quality Principles of App Description Texts and Their Significance in Deciding to Use Health Apps as Assessed by Medical Students: Survey Study [J].
Albrecht, Urs-Vito ;
Malinka, Christin ;
Long, Sarah ;
Raupach, Tobias ;
Hasenfuss, Gerd ;
von Jan, Ute .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2019, 7 (02)
[3]   Comparison of smartphone application-based vital sign monitors without external hardware versus those used in clinical practice: a prospective trial [J].
Alexander, John C. ;
Minhajuddin, Abu ;
Joshi, Girish P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2017, 31 (04) :825-831
[4]   Contribution of mobile health applications to self-management by consumers: review of published evidence [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Emmerton, Lynne M. .
AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2016, 40 (05) :591-597
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BUSINESS OF APPS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, MHEALTH NEW HORIZONS, DOI [DOI 10.4258/HIR.2020.26.3.2381,2, DOI 10.4258/HIR.2012.18.3.231]
[7]   Is the Health App Challenge approach of patient-led application conception, development, and review worthwhile? [J].
Ashurst, Emily J. ;
Jones, Ray B. .
HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 6 (01) :83-92
[8]   Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature [J].
Bastawrous, Andrew ;
Armstrong, Matthew J. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2013, 106 (04) :130-142
[9]   Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations [J].
Boudreaux, Edwin D. ;
Waring, Molly E. ;
Hayes, Rashelle B. ;
Sadasivam, Rajani S. ;
Mullen, Sean ;
Pagoto, Sherry .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 4 (04) :363-371
[10]   How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX [J].
Boulos, Maged N. Kamel ;
Wheeler, Steve ;
Tavares, Carlos ;
Jones, Ray .
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2011, 10