Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis

被引:26
|
作者
Torbati, SS
Guss, DA
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
appendicitis; helical computed tomography (CT); perforated appendix;
D O I
10.1197/aemj.10.8.823
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the impact of an emergency department (ED) guideline employing selective use of helical computed tomography (CT) on clinical outcomes of female patients with suspected appendicitis. Methods: All patients presenting with suspected appendicitis were prospectively enrolled and managed in accordance with a guideline incorporating selective use of helical CT. Although not the objective of this investigation, male patients were included for purposes of comparison. Patients with clinically evident appendicitis were referred to the surgical service, and patients with equivocal presentations were studied with helical CT. Patients were followed to final surgical or clinical outcomes. Outcome measures included time from ED presentation to laparotomy and rate of appendiceal perforation. These measures were compared with those of a historical cohort of patients preceding the use of helical CT. Results: A total of 310 consecutive patients with suspected appendicitis were enrolled; 92 had appendicitis. Sixty patients were referred to the surgical service without helical CT, and 41 had appendicitis (68%). Helical CT was performed on 250 patients; 51 had appendicitis (20%). For males, the mean interval from ED presentation to laparotomy was 559 minutes (95% CI=444 to 674 minutes) during guideline use and 480 minutes (95% CI=405 to 555 minutes) before. This interval for females was 433 minutes (95% CI=326 to 540 minutes) during guideline use and 710 minutes (95% CI=558 to 862 minutes) before. Appendiceal perforation rate for males was 0.25 (95% CI=0.14 to 0.36) during guideline use and 0.38 (95% CI=0.29 to 0.47) before; perforation rate for females was 0.06 (95% CI=-0.05 to 0.17) during guideline use and 0.23 (95% CI=0.14 to 0.32) before. Helical CT had 92% sensitivity 97% specificity, and 96% accuracy in diagnosing appendicitis. Conclusions: Helical CT is highly accurate in detecting appendicitis in patients with equivocal ED presentations. The use of a guideline employing selective helical CT was associated with a decline in the time from ED presentation to operative intervention in females.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 829
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Helical computed tomographic incidence and characterization of appendoliths in 100 patients with appendicitis
    Rao P.M.
    Rhea J.T.
    Novelline R.A.
    Emergency Radiology, 1997, 4 (2) : 55 - 61
  • [32] Unenhanced helical CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis changes disposition of patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute appendicitis
    Christopher, FL
    Lane, MJ
    Ward, JA
    Morgan, JA
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 23 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [33] Patient gender-related performance of nonfocused helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
    Raman, SS
    Kadell, BM
    Vodopich, DJ
    Sayer, J
    Cryer, H
    Lu, DSK
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2003, 27 (04) : 583 - 589
  • [34] An Interdisciplinary Initiative to Reduce Radiation Exposure: Evaluation of Appendicitis in a Pediatric Emergency Department With Clinical Assessment Supported by a Staged Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Pathway
    Ramarajan, Naresh
    Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh
    Barth, Richard
    Ghanouni, Pejman
    Mueller, Claudia
    Dannenburg, Bernard
    Wang, N. Ewen
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (11) : 1258 - 1265
  • [35] Effect of focused protocol on reducing radiation dose for children who require computed tomography for suspected appendicitis
    Roberts, Suzanne
    Goldwasser, Bernard
    Nixon, Abigail F.
    Borkar, Deeksha
    Brookman, Max
    Fox, Carolyn E.
    Rosenfeld, Cyril
    Meltzer, James A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 76 - 79
  • [36] Value of Additional Ultrasound Examination in Patients with Equivocal Computed Tomography Findings of Acute Appendicitis: Comparison with Computed Tomography Reassessment
    Sim, Ji Ye
    Kim, Hyuk Jung
    Jang, Suk Ki
    Yeon, Jae Woo
    Jeon, Byeong Geon
    Ha, Young Rock
    Paik, So Ya
    Cho, June Sik
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2019, 27 (02) : 75 - 80
  • [37] The effect of point-of- care ultrasonography on emergency department length of stay and CT utilization in children with suspected appendicitis
    James W Tsung
    Ee T Tay
    Inna Elikashvili
    Critical Ultrasound Journal, 6 (Suppl 1)
  • [38] Computed tomography scan usage when US results are non-diagnostic for suspected acute appendicitis in children
    Kim, Injoon
    Kwon, Hyuksool
    Choi, Yoo Jin
    Kwak, Young Ho
    Lee, Jin Hee
    Suh, Dongbum
    Jung, Jae Yun
    Park, Joong Wan
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (36) : E21961
  • [39] Rates of Concurrent Computed Tomography Imaging Following Ultrasound for Pediatric Patients With Appendicitis
    Scaife, Jack H.
    Iantorno, Stephanie E.
    Bucher, Brian T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 302 : 134 - 143
  • [40] Emergency Department Computed Tomography Use for Non-traumatic Abdominal Pain: Minimal Variability
    Cross, Roderick
    Bhat, Rahul
    Li, Ying
    Plankey, Michael
    Maloy, Kevin
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 782 - 796