Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion

被引:9
作者
Ikegami, Daisuke [1 ]
Hosono, Noboru [1 ]
Mukai, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Tateishi, Kosuke [1 ]
Fuji, Takeshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Hosp, Japan Community Healthcare Org, Orthoped Surg, 4-2-78 Fukushima, Osaka 5530003, Japan
关键词
Central decompression; Foraminal stenosis; Lumbar spinal canal stenosis; Multivariate logistic regression analysis; Receiver operating characteristic curves; Reoperation; Retrolisthesis; SPINAL STENOSIS; INSTABILITY; DISC; ENTRAPMENT; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: For patients diagnosed with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic foraminal stenosis (FS), surgeons occasionally only decompress central stenosis and preserve asymptomatic FS. These surgeries have the potential risk of converting preoperative asymptomatic FS into symptomatic FS postoperatively by accelerating spinal degeneration, which requires reoperation. However, little is known about delayed-onset symptomatic FS postoperatively. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the rate of reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS after lumbar central canal decompression in patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS, and determine the predictive risk factors of those reoperations. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing posterior central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis between January 2009 and June 2014 were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of patients who had preoperative FS and the reoperation rate for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels were the outcome measures. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups with and without preoperative asymptomatic FS at the decompressed levels. The baseline characteristics and revision rates for delayed-onset symptomatic FS were compared between the two groups. Predictive risk factors for such reoperations were determined using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 118 patients (56.7%) had asymptomatic FS. Of those, 18 patients (15.3%) underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at a mean of 1.9 years after the initial surgery. Posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation were significant risk factors for reoperation due to FS. The optimal cutoff values of posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation for predicting the occurrence of such reoperations were both 1 mm; 66.7% of patients who met both of these cutoff values had undergone reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 15.3% of patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels at a mean of 1.9 years after central decompression, and preoperative retrolisthesis was a predictive risk factor for such a reoperation. These findings are valuable for establishing standards of appropriate treatment strategies in patients with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic FS. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1073
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance Imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis
    Aota, Yoichi
    Niwa, Tetsu
    Yoshikawa, Kohki
    Fujiwara, Atsushi
    Asada, Toshio
    Saito, Tomoyuki
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (08) : 896 - 903
  • [2] BURTON CV, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P191
  • [3] Dimensions of the lumbar intervertebral foramina as determined from the sagittal plane magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 normal subjects
    Cramer, GD
    Cantu, JA
    Dorsett, RD
    Greenstein, JS
    McGregor, M
    Howe, JE
    Glenn, WV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (03) : 160 - 170
  • [4] Datta Sukdeb, 2013, Pain Physician, V16, pSE97
  • [5] Bilateral partial laminectomy: A treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and midline disc herniation
    Eule, JM
    Breeze, R
    Kindt, GW
    [J]. SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (04): : 329 - 337
  • [6] Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Neo, Masashi
    Takemoto, Mitsuru
    Ota, Masato
    Nakamura, Takashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (04) : 500 - 508
  • [7] Furman MB, 2008, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V11, P855
  • [8] Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis
    Ghogawala, Z
    Benzel, EC
    Amin-Hanjani, S
    Barker, FG
    Harrington, JF
    Magge, SN
    Strugar, J
    Couman, JVCE
    Borges, LF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2004, 1 (03): : 267 - 272
  • [9] DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS WITH SPINAL STENOSIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING DECOMPRESSION WITH DECOMPRESSION AND INTERTRANSVERSE PROCESS ARTHRODESIS
    HERKOWITZ, HN
    KURZ, LT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (06) : 802 - 808
  • [10] Age distribution of three radiologic factors for lumbar instability: Probable aging process of the instability with disc degeneration
    Iguchi, T
    Kanemura, A
    Kasahara, K
    Kurihara, A
    Doita, M
    Yoshiya, S
    [J]. SPINE, 2003, 28 (23) : 2628 - 2633