Identifying Hot Spots by Modeling Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Crashes Separately

被引:19
作者
Geedipally, Srinivas Reddy [1 ]
Lord, Dominique [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Transportat Inst, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3141/2147-12
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Considerable research has been conducted on the development of stabs heal models for predicting motor vehicle crashes on highway facilities These models often have been used to estimate the number of crashes per unit of time for an entire highway segment or intersection without distingushing the influence that subgroups have on crash risk The two most important subgroups Identified in the literature are single and multi vehicle crashes Recently, researchers have noted that two distinct models for these two categories of crashes provide better predicting performance than models that combine both crash categories to predict crashes for an entire facility Thus, a study was done to determine whether any difference exists in the identification of hot spots when a single model is applied instead of two distinct models A hot spot (or black spot) is a site with an accident frequency that is significantly higher than expected at some prescribed level of significance The data used for the comparison analysis were collected on Texas multilane undivided highways for 1997 to 2001 The study shows that modeling single and multivehicle crashes separately predicts slightly fewer false positives and negatives than mod ding them together under a single aggregated model in the hot spot identification process Thus, It is recommended that separate models be developed for single and multivehicle crashes for predicting crashes and for identifying hot spots
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
BONNESON J, 2007, 07047034 FHWATX TEX
[2]  
Carey J., 2001, Arizona local government safety project (LGSP) analysis model
[3]   Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods [J].
Cheng, W ;
Washington, SP .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2005, 37 (05) :870-881
[4]   New Criteria for Evaluating Methods of Identifying Hot Spots [J].
Cheng, Wen ;
Washington, Simon .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2083) :76-85
[5]   Accident prediction models with random corridor parameters [J].
El-Basyouny, Karim ;
Sayed, Tarek .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (05) :1118-1123
[6]  
GEEDIPALLY SR, ACCIDENT AN IN PRESS
[7]  
Griffith M. S., 1999, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1665, P28, DOI DOI 10.3141/1665-05
[8]   Macrolevel accident prediction models for evaluating safety of urban transportation systems [J].
Hadayeghi, A ;
Shalaby, AS ;
Persaud, HN .
STATISTICAL METHODS AND MODELING AND SAFETY DATA, ANALYSIS, AND EVALUATION: SAFETY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2003, (1840) :87-95
[9]   ESTIMATING NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS AT INTERSECTIONS FROM A KNOWLEDGE OF TRAFFIC FLOWS ON APPOACHES [J].
HAKKERT, AS ;
MAHALEL, D .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1978, 10 (01) :69-79
[10]  
Harwood D. W., 2007, 129 NCHRP NAT AC TRA