The EGSnrc Monte Carlo system was used to calculate response, defined as the ratio of the dose to the gas in the cavity and air kerma free-in-air at the center of the cavity, normalized at Co-60. Calculations of the response of a graphite cavity and. Exradin A12 air-equivalent plastic chambers were compared with measurements using free-air ionization chambers. For the graphite chamber, the agreement between measured and calculated chamber response diverges up to 8% down to 50 kV. We simulated the high-Z contamination, distributed over the inner surface of the wall in the form of iron grains, by introducing an iron ring of Ipm thickness covering 0.45% of the area on the inside wall. These amounts of high-Z contamination are perfectly conceivable considering the machining process of the graphite cavity. Assuming pure C552, for the Exradin A12 the agreement is within 0.5% down to 85 keV but gradually gets worse at lower energies. A mass spectroscopic analysis of C552 showed that the amount of impurities with Z between 10 and 82 amounts to 90 mug/g. The calculations with the full composition as resulting from the analysis show agreement within 0.4% down to 70 keV. Below that energy, deviations amount up to 8%. These can be explained by (1) impurities on the inside surface of the wall from the machining process as demonstrated from measurements on other chambers of the same type; (2) accuracy of the spectra used in the calculations; (3) geometrical details of the chamber such as the stem.