Frozen Sections for Margins During Partial Nephrectomy Do Not Influence Recurrence Rates

被引:5
作者
Dagenais, Julien [1 ]
Mouracade, Pascal [1 ]
Maurice, Matthew [1 ]
Kara, Onder [1 ]
Nelson, Ryan [1 ]
Chavali, Jaya [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Dept Urol, 9500 Euclid Ave,Q10-1, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
frozen section; partial nephrectomy; positive margin; recurrence; NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; FOLLOW-UP; ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; COMPETING RISK; BREAST-CANCER; PATTERNS; INSTITUTION;
D O I
10.1089/end.2018.0314
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Frozen sections (FS) are routinely employed to assess margin status during partial nephrectomy (PN) for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma (CLRCC); however, their oncologic benefit remains unclear. There have been no studies investigating the long-term impact of FS on local or metastatic recurrence. We wished to determine whether the utilization of FS for this purpose during PN influenced recurrence rates. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 1090 patients with (n=172) and without (n=918) FS during open and robotic PN between 2006 and 2016 for CLRCC at a single tertiary care institution. Standard follow-up protocols were employed, with imaging used to guide subsequent biopsy for confirmation. Univariate and multivariate competing-risk regression analysis predicting the association of FS status and clinicodemographic characteristics with recurrence, with adjustment for all-cause mortality, were performed. Administrative data were reviewed to calculate costs of FS. Results: Forty-five out of 1090 (4.13%) patients had recurrence. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrence between patients with and without FS ((2)=0.001, p=0.97). On multivariable competing risk analysis, FS was not associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-3.76). However, tumor grade (g3-4 vs 1-2: HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.16-5.14) and stage (>pT2 vs pT1a: HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.13-7.26) were associated with recurrence. The average direct charge per patient undergoing FS was $902. Conclusions: Intraoperative FS for margins during PN did not predict decreased recurrence rates in a single-institution high-volume center. Given the lack of associated benefit, and the added cost, the utilization of FS during PN should be limited.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 764
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   A Retrospective Comparison of 2 Methods of Intraoperative Margin Evaluation During Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Hagemann, Ian S. ;
Lewis, James S., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02) :500-505
[12]   Utility of Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Single Institution Experience [J].
Hillyer, Shahab P. ;
Yakoubi, Rachid ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Isac, Wahib ;
Miocinovic, Ranko ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
Khalifeh, Ali ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) :324-327
[13]   Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: The STEEP system [J].
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Costantino, Joseph P. ;
Gray, Robert J. ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Chapman, Judith-Anne W. ;
Sparano, Joseph A. ;
Hunsberger, Sally ;
Enos, Rebecca A. ;
Gelber, Richard D. ;
Zujewski, Jo Anne .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (15) :2127-2132
[14]   Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Step-by-step Contemporary Technique and Surgical Outcomes at a Single High-volume Institution [J].
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Khalifeh, Ali ;
Hillyer, Shahab ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Autorino, Riccardo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) :553-561
[15]   Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy [J].
Kubinski, DJ ;
Clark, PE ;
Assimos, DG ;
Hall, MC .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (01) :31-34
[16]   Positive Surgical Margins After Nephron-Sparing Surgery [J].
Marszalek, Martin ;
Carini, Marco ;
Chlosta, Piotr ;
Jeschke, Klaus ;
Kirkali, Ziya ;
Knuechel, Ruth ;
Madersbacher, Stephan ;
Patard, Jean-Jacques ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (04) :757-763
[17]   Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Mir, Maria Carmen ;
Derweesh, Ithaar ;
Porpiglia, Francesco ;
Zargar, Homayoun ;
Mottrie, Alexandre ;
Autorino, Riccardo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) :606-617
[18]   Patterns and Predictors of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for Kidney Tumors [J].
Mouracade, Pascal ;
Kara, Onder ;
Maurice, Matthew J. ;
Dagenais, Julien ;
Malkoc, Ercan ;
Nelson, Ryan J. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (06) :1403-1409
[19]   Positive Surgical Margins With Renal Cell Carcinoma Have a Limited Influence on Long-term Oncological Outcomes of Nephron Sparing Surgery [J].
Raz, Orit ;
Mendlovic, Sonia ;
Shilo, Yaniv ;
Leibovici, Dan ;
Sandbank, Judith ;
Lindner, Arie ;
Zisman, Amnon .
UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) :277-280
[20]   A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time [J].
Schemper, M ;
Smith, TL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (04) :343-346