Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models

被引:518
作者
El-Rashidy, Aiah A. [1 ]
Roether, Judith A. [2 ]
Harhaus, Leila [3 ]
Kneser, Ulrich [3 ]
Boccaccini, Aldo R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Dept Biomat, Fac Oral & Dent Med, Cairo 11562, Egypt
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Polymer Mat, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Hand Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Burn Ctr, BG Trauma Ctr Ludwigshafen Plast & Hand Surg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[4] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Biomat, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Bone regeneration; Bioactive glass; 3D scaffolds; In vivo; Bone defects; Animal model; OF-THE-ART; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; SOL-GEL; TISSUE REGENERATION; IONIC PRODUCTS; GROWTH-FACTORS; OSTEOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; HYDROXYAPATITE CONVERSION; CERAMIC SCAFFOLDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Large bone defects resulting from fractures and disease are a medical concern, being often unable to heal spontaneously by the body's repair mechanisms. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is a promising approach for treating bone defects through providing a template to guide osseous regeneration. 3D scaffolds with microstructure mimicking host bone are necessary in common BTE strategies. Bioactive glasses (BGs) attract researchers' attention as BTE scaffolds as they are osteoconductive and osteoinductive in certain formulations. In vivo animal models allow understanding and evaluation of materials' performance in the complex physiological environment, being an inevitable step before clinical trials. The aim of this paper is to review for the first time published research investigating the in vivo osseous regenerative capacity of 3D BG scaffolds in bone defect animal models, to better understand and evaluate the progress and future outlook of the use of such scaffolds in BTE. The literature analysis reveals that the regenerative capacity of BG scaffolds depends on several factors; including BG composition, fabrication method, scaffold microstructure and pore characteristics, in addition to scaffold pretreatment and whether or not the scaffolds are loaded with growth factors. In addition, animal species selected, defect size and implantation time affect the scaffold in vivo behavior and outcomes. The review of the literature also makes clear the difficulty encountered to compare different types of bioactive glass scaffolds in their bone forming ability. Even considering such limitations of the current state-of-the-art, results generated from animal bone defect models provide an essential source of information to guide the design of BG scaffolds in future. Statement of Significance Bioactive glasses are at the centre of increasing research efforts in bone tissue engineering as the number of research groups around the world carrying out research on this type of biomaterials continues to increase. However, there are no previous reviews in literature which specifically cover investigations of the performance of bioactive glass scaffolds in bone defect animal models. This is the topic of the present review, in which we have analysed comprehensively all available literature in the field. The review thus fills a gap in the biomaterials literature providing a broad platform of information for researchers interested in bioactive glasses in general and specifically in the outcomes of in vivo models. Bioactive glass scaffolds of different compositions tested in relevant bone defect models are covered. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:28
相关论文
共 164 条
[1]   Bioactive functional materials: a perspective on phosphate-based glasses [J].
Abou Neel, Ensanya A. ;
Pickup, David M. ;
Valappil, Sabeel P. ;
Newport, Robert J. ;
Knowles, Jonathan C. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, 2009, 19 (06) :690-701
[2]   Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality:: Potential implications for in vivo bone research [J].
Aerssens, J ;
Boonen, S ;
Lowet, G ;
Dequeker, J .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1998, 139 (02) :663-670
[3]  
Åkesson K, 2003, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V81, P657
[4]  
Amini Ami R., 2012, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, V40, P363
[5]  
ASTM International, 2014, F272109 ASTM INT
[6]   Odontogenic responses of human dental pulp cells to collagen/nanobioactive glass nanocomposites [J].
Bae, Won-Jung ;
Min, Kyung-San ;
Kim, Jong-Jin ;
Kim, Jung-Ju ;
Kim, Hae-Won ;
Kim, Eun-Cheol .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2012, 28 (12) :1271-1279
[7]   Bioactive glass-based materials with hierarchical porosity for medical applications: Review of recent advances [J].
Baino, Francesco ;
Fiorilli, Sonia ;
Vitale-Brovarone, Chiara .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2016, 42 :18-32
[8]  
Balasubramanian P., 2015, Biomed. Glas, V1, P51, DOI [10.1515/bglass-2015-0006, DOI 10.1515/BGLASS-2015-0006]
[9]  
Bao CLM, 2013, REGENERATIVE MEDICINE AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, P599, DOI 10.5772/55916
[10]   Healing of critical-size segmental defects in rat femora using strong porous bioactive glass scaffolds [J].
Bi, Lianxiang ;
Zobell, Brett ;
Liu, Xin ;
Rahaman, Mohamed N. ;
Bonewald, Lynda F. .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 42 :816-824