Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the society of toxicologic pathology

被引:54
作者
Creasy, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] Huntington Life Sci, E Millstone, NJ USA
关键词
testes; histopathology; tubular staging; microscopic evaluation; spermatogenesis;
D O I
10.1002/bdrb.10041
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Detection of chemically induced effects on male fertility and on testicular spermatogenesis in particular, has become of increasing concern. More stringent regulatory guidelines, introduced by ICH, EPA and OECD (Table 1) have raised the awareness of toxicologists and pathologists for the need to conduct sensitive and careful evaluation of the male reproductive tract for potential toxic effects of administered compounds. With it has come confusion and in many cases, inappropriate procedures, often based on misunderstanding of what is required and on inadequate understanding of spermatogenesis. This article summarizes and discusses the main recommendations recently proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology on recommended approaches for the evaluation of testicular and epididymal toxicity [Lanning LL, Creasy DM, Chapin RE, Mann PC, Barlow NJ, Regan KS, Goodman DG. Toxicologic Pathology 30:518-531, 2002]. The major recommendations are: Use sexually mature animals to evaluate effects on spermatogenesis. Sample left and right testes and epididymides and record organ weights. Use modified Davidson's fixative to fix testes from all species from studies of 13 wks duration and less. Examine transverse sections of the testes (including part of the rete), and longitudinal sections of the epididymides. Embed tissues in paraffin wax. For rodent studies up to 28 days, examine periodic acid-Schiff's-hematoxylin stained sections. For all other studies examine hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Microscopic evaluation of the testis should be a qualitative evaluation carried out with an awareness of the spermatogenic cycle. Quantitative procedures are inappropriate for screening studies. Nomenclature and grading of findings for spermatogenic disturbances will vary on a case by case basis. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 8703800 OPPTS
[2]  
Chapin R. E., 1999, EVALUATION INTERPRET, P28
[3]  
Chapin R. E, 2002, CURRENT PROTOCOLS TO
[4]  
Creasy D. M., 1999, VET PATHOL, V36, P518
[5]   Evaluation of testicular toxicity in safety evaluation studies: The appropriate use of spermatogenic staging [J].
Creasy, DM .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1997, 25 (02) :119-131
[6]   Pathogenesis of male reproductive toxicity [J].
Creasy, DM .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2001, 29 (01) :64-76
[7]   USE OF QUANTITATIVE TESTICULAR HISTOLOGY TO ASSESS THE EFFECT OF DIBROMOCHOLOROPROPANE (DBCP) ON REPRODUCTION IN RABBITS [J].
FOOTE, RH ;
BERNDTSON, WE ;
ROUNSAVILLE, TR .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1986, 6 (04) :638-647
[8]   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STAGES AND TRANSITIONS IN THE CYCLE OF THE RAT SEMINIFEROUS EPITHELIUM - LIGHT MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS OF PERFUSION-FIXED AND PLASTIC-EMBEDDED TESTES [J].
HESS, RA .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1990, 43 (03) :525-542
[9]  
Hess RA., 1993, Methods in toxicology 3. Part A, P86
[10]  
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q6A, 1995, INT C HARM TECHN REQ