Optimizing the design of invasive placebo interventions in randomized controlled trials

被引:17
作者
Cousins, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blencowe, N. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tsang, C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chalmers, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mardanpour, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Carr, A. J. [5 ]
Campbell, M. K. [7 ]
Cook, J. A. [5 ,6 ]
Beard, D. J. [5 ,6 ]
Blazeby, J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Biomed Res Ctr, NIHR, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Surg Innovat Theme, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol Sch Med, Bristol Ctr Surg Res, Med Res Council ConDuCT II Hub Trials Methodol Re, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Oxford, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Royal Coll Surg England Surg Intervent Trials Uni, Oxford, England
[7] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; SHAM SURGERY; VERTEBROPLASTY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11509
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Placebo-controlled trials play an important role in the evaluation of healthcare interventions. However, they can be challenging to design and deliver for invasive interventions, including surgery. In-depth understanding of the component parts of the treatment intervention is needed to ascertain what should, and should not, be delivered as part of the placebo. Assessment of risk to patients and strategies to ensure that the placebo effectively mimics the treatment are also required. To date, no guidance exists for the design of invasive placebo interventions. This study aimed to develop a framework to optimize the design and delivery of invasive placebo interventions in RCTs. Methods A preliminary framework was developed using published literature to: expand the scope of an existing typology, which facilitates the deconstruction of invasive interventions; and identify placebo optimization strategies. The framework was refined after consultation with key stakeholders in surgical trials, consensus methodology and medical ethics. Results The resulting DITTO framework consists of five stages: deconstruct treatment intervention into constituent components and co-interventions; identify critical surgical element(s); take out the critical element(s); think risk, feasibility and role of placebo in the trial when considering remaining components; and optimize placebo to ensure effective blinding of patients and trial personnel. Conclusion DITTO considers invasive placebo composition systematically, accounting for risk, feasibility and placebo optimization. Use of the framework can support the design of high-quality RCTs, which are needed to underpin delivery of healthcare interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1122
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial [J].
Al-Lamee, Rasha ;
Thompson, David ;
Dehbi, Hakim-Moulay ;
Sen, Sayan ;
Tang, Kare ;
Davies, John ;
Keeble, Thomas ;
Mielewczik, Michael ;
Kaprielian, Raffi ;
Malik, Iqbal S. ;
Nijjer, Sukhjinder S. ;
Petraco, Ricardo ;
Cook, Christopher ;
Ahmad, Yousif ;
Howard, James ;
Baker, Christopher ;
Sharp, Andrew ;
Gerber, Robert ;
Talwar, Suneel ;
Assomull, Ravi ;
Mayet, Jamil ;
Wensel, Roland ;
Collier, David ;
Shun-Shin, Matthew ;
Thom, Simon A. ;
Davies, Justin E. ;
Francis, Darrel P. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10115) :31-40
[2]   Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Ali, Usama Ahmed ;
van der Sluis, Pieter C. ;
Issa, Yama ;
Abou Habaga, Ibrahim ;
Gooszen, Hein G. ;
Flum, David R. ;
Algra, Ale ;
Besselink, Marc G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (02) :199-207
[3]   Statistics notes - Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7310) :446-447
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, DEV EVALUATING COMPL
[5]   A survey on beliefs and attitudes of trainee surgeons towards placebo [J].
Baldwin, Mathew J. ;
Wartolowska, Karolina ;
Carr, Andrew J. .
BMC SURGERY, 2016, 16
[6]   Standardizing and monitoring the delivery of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials [J].
Blencowe, N. S. ;
Mills, N. ;
Cook, J. A. ;
Donovan, J. L. ;
Rogers, C. A. ;
Whiting, P. ;
Blazeby, J. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (10) :1377-1384
[7]   Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design [J].
Blencowe, Natalie S. ;
Cook, Jonathan A. ;
Pinkney, Thomas ;
Rogers, Chris ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (02) :211-218
[8]   A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures [J].
Buchbinder, Rachelle ;
Osborne, Richard H. ;
Ebeling, Peter R. ;
Wark, John D. ;
Mitchell, Peter ;
Wriedt, Chris ;
Graves, Stephen ;
Staples, Margaret P. ;
Murphy, Bridie .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (06) :557-568
[9]   Developing a placebo-controlled trial in surgery: Issues of design, acceptability and feasibility [J].
Campbell, M. K. ;
Entwistle, V. A. ;
Cuthbertson, B. H. ;
Skea, Z. C. ;
Sutherland, A. G. ;
McDonald, A. M. ;
Norrie, J. D. ;
Carlson, R. V. ;
Bridgman, S. .
TRIALS, 2011, 12
[10]   SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials [J].
Chan, An-Wen ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer M. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Mann, Howard ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Dickersin, Kay ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Parulekar, Wendy R. ;
Krleza-Jeric, Karmela ;
Laupacis, Andreas ;
Moher, David .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346