Configurations of Big Data Analytics for Firm Performance: An fsQCA approach Completed Research

被引:0
作者
Mikalef, Patrick [1 ]
Boura, Maria [2 ]
Lekakos, George [2 ]
Krogstie, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Athens, Greece
来源
25TH AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMCIS 2019) | 2019年
关键词
Big Data Analytics; Firm Performance; Information Governance; Environmental Uncertainty; fsQCA; CAPABILITIES; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; AGENDA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With big data analytics growing rapidly in importance, academics and practitioners have been considering the means through which they can incorporate the shifts these technologies bring into their competitive strategies. Early empirical evidence suggests that big data analytics can enhance a firm's performance; yet, there is a lack of understanding on complementary organizational factors coalesce to drive performance gains, under what conditions they are more appropriate, as well as how they can complement a firm's dynamic capabilities under turbulent and fast -paced market conditions. To address this question, this study builds on the big data analytics capability literature and examines the fit between big data analytics resources and governance practices, dynamic capabilities, and environmental conditions in driving performance gains. Survey data from 175 chief information officers and IT managers working in Greek firms is analyzed by means of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Results show that that different configurations of resources, practices, and external factors coalesce to drive performance gains. We show that there are multiple configurations that can lead in high and low levels of performance.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]  
Ragin CharlesC., 2009, CONFIGURATIONAL COMP, P87, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452226569.N5
[32]   Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios [J].
Rai, Arun ;
Tang, Xinlin .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (03) :516-542
[33]  
Ramakrishnan T, 2018, ANN INFORM SYST, V21, P15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58097-5_3
[34]   Business Intelligence Capabilities and Effectiveness: An Integrative Model [J].
Ramakrishnan, Thiagarajan ;
Khuntia, Jiban ;
Kathuria, Abhishek ;
Saldanha, Terence .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS 2016), 2016, :5022-5031
[35]  
Saldanha T., 2011, INT C INF SYST ICIS
[36]  
Saldanha TJV, 2017, MIS QUART, V41, P267
[37]   Transforming decision-making processes: a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations [J].
Sharma, Rajeev ;
Mithas, Sunil ;
Kankanhalli, Atreyi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 23 (04) :433-441
[38]  
Straub D., 2004, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, V13, P24, DOI [DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.01324, 10.17705/1CAIS.01324]
[39]   The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance [J].
Tallon, Paul P. ;
Ramirez, Ronald V. ;
Short, James E. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 30 (03) :141-177
[40]   Corporate Governance of Big Data: Perspectives on Value, Risk, and Cost [J].
Tallon, Paul P. .
COMPUTER, 2013, 46 (06) :32-38