Evaluating Stratified Substrates Effect on Containerized Crop Growth under Varied Irrigation Strategies

被引:16
作者
Criscione, Kristopher S. [1 ]
Fields, Jeb S. [1 ]
Owen, Jim S., Jr. [2 ]
Fultz, Lisa [3 ]
Bush, Edward [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Agr Ctr, Hammond Res Stn, 21549 Old Covington Hwy, Hammond, LA 70403 USA
[2] Applicat Technol Res Unit, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ AgCtr, Sch Plant Soil & Environm Sci, 310 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Plant Soil & Environm Sci, 257 JC Miller Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
coconut coir; cyclic; Loropetalum chinensis 'Ruby'; pine bark; sphagnum peat; soilless; water efficiencies; PINE-BARK SUBSTRATE; FATTY-ACID PATTERNS; PLANT WATER STATUS; DOUGLAS-FIR BARK; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; CYCLIC IRRIGATION; TREE SUBSTRATE; USE EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI16288-21
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Growers rely on soilless substrates to provide sufficient water and nutrients to containerized crops. Traditional bark-based substrates are engineered to have relatively low water-holding capabilities, which can lead to nonuniform rewetting patterns and inefficient usage of water resources. Engineering substrates to redistribute water dynamics and maximize aeration within the container may improve water resource efficiencies. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether more efficient irrigation schedules can be used when stratifying unique substrates within a container for added crop water and nutrient efficiency. Loropetalum chinense 'Ruby' liners were planted and grown in a conventional pine bark substrate or one of three stratified substrate treatments, including a bark:peat, bark:coir, or fine bark layered on top of a coarse bark. The crops were grown under four different irrigation schedules, including single daily application, single application at deficit levels, cyclic application, or cyclic at deficit schedules. Stratified substrates improved crop growth, quality, and yield when compared with plants grown in conventional bark in the single application irrigation treatment. Measured at final harvest, substrates positively influenced plant growth index (P < 0.0001), whereas irrigation scheduling alone had no effect (P = 0.6321). There was a strong interaction between substrate and irrigation schedules on Delta growth index (P = 0.0141). There were strong substrate effects on shoot dry weight (P = 0.0060), root dry weight (P = 0.0342), and growth index (P = 0.0040). The stratified bark:coir treatment outgrew all other substrate treatments. In addition, within all irrigation treatments, plants grown with the stratified bark:coir substrate had the highest survival ratings among the other substrate treatments, whereas the conventional bark had the lowest survival rates. Substrate and irrigation had an effect on nitrogen and potassium leachate concentrations levels (P = 0.0107 and P = 0.0004, respectively). Evaluation of microbial communities showed that substrate (P = 0.0010) and the stratified layer (P = 0.0010) had strong influences on the type of community present and the relative abundance in the treatments used herein this study. Specifically, within cyclic scheduling, bark:peat actinomycete populations were significantly greater than other substrate treatments. Furthermore, under deficit irrigation, stratified substrate systems were able to mitigate crop water stress. The results indicate that when crops such as the Loropetalum are grown in the stratified system, crop growth can be sustained when drought conditions are present. This is possible by providing adequate water availability even under low water inputs until subsequent irrigations during the fragile establishment period, when compared with using traditional bark-based substrates.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 413
页数:14
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [71] LeBude A., 2009, The pour-through extraction method: A nutrient management tool for nursery crops, P1
  • [72] Profitability of Sensor-based Irrigation in Greenhouse and Nursery Crops
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    Majsztrik, John
    Saavoss, Monica
    [J]. HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 23 (06) : 770 - 774
  • [73] Lieth J.H., 2008, Irrigation in soilless production
  • [74] Plant Water Uptake in Drying Soils
    Lobet, Guillaume
    Couvreur, Valentin
    Meunier, Felicien
    Javaux, Mathieu
    Draye, Xavier
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 164 (04) : 1619 - 1627
  • [75] Hydrological Behavior of Peat- and Coir-Based Substrates and Their Effect on Begonia Growth
    Londra, Paraskevi
    Paraskevopoulou, Angeliki
    Psychogiou, Maria
    [J]. WATER, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [76] Lopez R.G., 2008, Greenhouse Mgt. Production, V28, P26
  • [77] Virginia Nursery and Greenhouse Grower Survey of Best Management Practices
    Mack, Rachel
    Owen, James S.
    Niemiera, Alex X.
    Latimer, Joyce
    [J]. HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 386 - 392
  • [78] Use of fatty acids for identification of AM fungi and estimation of the biomass of AM spores in soil
    Madan, R
    Pankhurst, C
    Hawke, B
    Smith, S
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 34 (01) : 125 - 128
  • [79] Water Use and Treatment in Container-Grown Specialty Crop Production: A Review
    Majsztrik, John C.
    Fernandez, R. Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Hitchcock, Daniel R.
    Lea-Cox, John
    Owen, James S., Jr.
    Oki, Lorence R.
    White, Sarah A.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2017, 228 (04)
  • [80] Marble C., 2020, 2020 ASHS ANN C