Parent and Physician Report of Discussions About Prognosis for Critically Ill Children*

被引:11
作者
Rissman, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Derrington, Sabrina [3 ,4 ]
Rychlik, Karen [2 ,5 ]
Michelson, Kelly N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Div Pediat Crit Care, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Pediat, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Biostat Res Core, Stanley Manne Childrens Res Inst, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
communication; pediatric intensive care unit; postintensive care syndrome; postintensive care unit outcomes; prognosis; prognostication; PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION; CRITICAL ILLNESS; COMMUNICATION; FAMILIES; QUALITY; DEATH; LIFE;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000002764
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Parents value clear communication with PICU clinicians about possible patient and family outcomes (prognostic conversations). We describe PICU parent and attending physician reports and agreement regarding the occurrence of prognostic conversations. We queried parents and physicians about prognostic conversation content, which healthcare providers had prognostic conversations, and whether parents wanted more prognostic information. Design: Prospective cross-sectional survey study. Setting: University-based 40-bed PICU. Participants: Parents and attending physicians of PICU patients with multiple organ dysfunction within 24 hours of PICU admission. Interventions: Surveys administered to parents and attending PICU physicians 5-10 days after PICU admission. Measurements and Main results: Surveys asked parents and physicians to report the occurrence of prognostic conversations related to PICU length of stay, risk of PICU mortality, and anticipated post-PICU physical, neurologic, and psychologic morbidities for patients and post-PICU psychologic morbidities for parents. Of 101 participants, 87 parents and 83 physicians reported having prognostic conversations. Overall concordance between parents and physicians was fair (Kappa = 0.22). Parents and physicians most commonly reported prognostic conversations about PICU length of stay (67.3% and 63.3%, respectively) and patient post-PICU physical morbidity (n = 48; 48.5% and n = 45; 44.5% respectively). Conversations reported less often by parents and physicians were about patient post-PICU psychologic morbidity (n = 13; 12.9% and n = 20; 19.8%, respectively). Per parent report, bedside nurses and physicians provided most prognostic information. Chaplains (n = 14; 50%) and social workers (n = 17; 60%) were more involved in conversations regarding parent psychologic morbidities. Most commonly, parents requested more information about length of stay and their child's physical morbidities. Parents less frequently wanted information about their own psychologic morbidities. Conclusions: Most parents and physicians report having prognostic conversations, primarily about length of stay and post-ICU physical morbidities. Concordance between parents and physicians is suboptimal. Future studies should evaluate prognostic conversations at other timepoints, how information is delivered, and how these conversations impact the PICU experience.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 794
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Impact of Pediatric Critical Illness and Injury on Families: An Updated Systematic Review [J].
Abela, Karla M. ;
Wardell, Diane ;
Rozmus, Cathy ;
LoBiondo-Wood, Geri .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2020, 51 :21-31
[2]   Discharge Planning Curricula in Internal Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey [J].
Aiyer, Meenakshy ;
Kukreja, Sandeep ;
Ibrahim-Ali, Waleed ;
Aldag, Jean .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 102 (08) :795-799
[3]   Families' Experiences of Life in the Year after a Child's Critical Illness: Navigating the Road to a "New Normal" [J].
Atkins, Ellie K. ;
John, Mary ;
Colville, Gillian .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 09 (03) :188-195
[4]   Communication preferences of pediatric cancer patients: talking about prognosis and their future life [J].
Brand, Sarah R. ;
Fasciano, Karen ;
Mack, Jennifer W. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (03) :769-774
[5]   Quality of Communication in the ICU and Surrogate's Understanding of Prognosis [J].
Chiarchiaro, Jared ;
Buddadhumaruk, Praewpannarai ;
Arnold, Robert M. ;
White, Douglas B. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (03) :542-548
[6]  
Goldstein Brahm, 2005, Pediatr Crit Care Med, V6, P2
[7]   Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support [J].
Harris, Paul A. ;
Taylor, Robert ;
Thielke, Robert ;
Payne, Jonathon ;
Gonzalez, Nathaniel ;
Conde, Jose G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) :377-381
[8]   Post-Intensive-Care Syndrome for the Pediatric Neurologist [J].
Hartman, Mary E. ;
Williams, Cydni N. ;
Hall, Trevor A. ;
Bosworth, Christopher C. ;
Piantino, Juan A. .
PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2020, 108 :47-53
[9]   Recommendations for mental health professionals in the NICU [J].
Hynan, M. T. ;
Steinberg, Z. ;
Baker, L. ;
Cicco, R. ;
Geller, P. A. ;
Lassen, S. ;
Milford, C. ;
Mounts, K. O. ;
Patterson, C. ;
Saxton, S. ;
Segre, L. ;
Stuebe, A. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 35 :S14-S18
[10]   Importance of organ dysfunction in determining hospital outcomes in children [J].
Johnston, JA ;
Yi, MS ;
Britto, MT ;
Mrus, JM .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2004, 144 (05) :595-601