Should BEVs be subsidized or taxed? A European perspective based on the economic value of CO2 emissions

被引:39
作者
Cavallaro, Federico [1 ]
Danielis, Romeo [2 ]
Nocera, Silvio [1 ]
Rotaris, Lucia [2 ]
机构
[1] IUAV Univ Venice, Santa Croce 191, I-30135 Venice, Italy
[2] Univ Trieste, Ple Europa 1, I-34100 Trieste, Italy
关键词
CO2; emissions; Well-to-Wheel analysis; Electric vehicles; European policies; European incentives; WELL-TO-WHEEL; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HYBRID; TRANSPORT; VARIABILITY; INCENTIVES; VALUATION; GASOLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Battery Electric vehicles (BEVs) are generally considered as potentially contributing to the reduction of CO2 emissions. Consequently, many countries have promoted (or are in the process of promoting) policies aimed at directly or indirectly subsidizing BEVs to accelerate their market uptake. The aim of this paper is to assess whether BEVs' subsidies are justified (and by what amount) with reference to the carbon component, distinguishing by car segments and countries. To address these research questions, a simulation model is developed, based on the most recent and reliable data available. The model estimates and monetizes the Well-to-Wheel CO2 emissions of six car segments in 28 European countries. The monetary value of the difference of the CO2 emissions between the non-BEVs and the BEVs ranges from -(sic)1133 (tax) to +(sic)3192 (subsidy), depending on the car segment and on the nation considered. These results are then compared to the policies about alternative fuels adopted by the single EU countries, suggesting in some cases the necessity to rethink such incentives.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 89
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
[41]   Economic valuation of Well-To-Wheel CO2 emissions from freight transport along the main transalpine corridors [J].
Nocera, Silvio ;
Cavallaro, Federico .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 47 :222-236
[42]   The competitiveness of alternative transport fuels for CO2 emissions [J].
Nocera, Silvio ;
Cavallaro, Federico .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 50 :1-14
[43]   Carbon estimation and urban mobility plans: Opportunities in a context of austerity [J].
Nocera, Silvio ;
Tonin, Stefania ;
Cavallaro, Federico .
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 :71-82
[44]   The economic impact of greenhouse gas abatement through a meta-analysis: Valuation, consequences and implications in terms of transport policy [J].
Nocera, Silvio ;
Tonin, Stefania ;
Cavallaro, Federico .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 37 :31-43
[45]  
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2011, WORKING PAPER
[46]   How should passenger travel in Mexico City be priced? [J].
Parry, Ian W. H. ;
Timilsina, Govinda R. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2010, 68 (02) :167-182
[47]   Electric vehicles: A tentative economic and environmental evaluation [J].
Prud'homme, Remy ;
Koning, Martin .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 23 :60-69
[48]   Total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of various automotive technologies in Italy [J].
Rusich, Andrea ;
Danielis, Romeo .
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 :3-16
[49]   The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption [J].
Sierzchula, William ;
Bakker, Sjoerd ;
Maat, Kees ;
van Wee, Bert .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :183-194
[50]  
SNCF Societe Nationale des Chemins de fer Francais, 2013, MOB EUR REV PASS FRE