Underwater vehicle hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming using hydrogen peroxide

被引:3
|
作者
Ji, Hyunjin [1 ]
Lee, Junghun [1 ]
Choi, Eunyeong [1 ]
Cho, Jang-hyeon [1 ]
机构
[1] Agcy Def Dev, POB 35, Daejeon 34186, South Korea
关键词
Methanol; Steam reforming; Hydrogen peroxide; Methanol conversion; Hydrogen; Underwater vehicle; FUEL-CELL; CATALYST; MICROREACTOR; SUPPORT; DESIGN; HEAT; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.182
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Methanol steam reforming (MSR) can supply hydrogen (H-2) to underwater vehicles equipped with a fuel cell. Low reaction temperatures ensure the composition of the reformed gas suitable for the H-2 purification unit and increase the design freedom of a reforming plant. However, such temperatures decrease the catalyst activity and thereby the methanol (MeOH) conversion and H-2 production. Herein, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was supplied with MeOH and water (H2O) to ensure sufficient MeOH conversion and H-2 production at low temperatures. A tube reactor loaded with a commercial Cu/Zn catalyst was installed in an electric furnace maintained at 200-250 C-circle, and MeOH and 0 wt%, 11.88 wt%, 22.51 wt%, and 32.07 wt% H2O2 were supplied. When the furnace temperature was 200 C-circle, the MeOH conversion was 49.3% at 0 wt% H2O2 but 93.5% at 32.07 wt% H2O2. The effect of adding H2O2 was greater under the temperature conditions where the MeOH conversion was 100% or less. To analyze the effect of H2O2 addition on catalyst durability, the furnace was maintained at 200 C-circle, and the reactor was continuously operated for 110 h with 0 wt% and 32.07 wt% H2O2. The addition of H2O2 did not significantly decrease the Cu/Zn catalyst durability. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30310 / 30319
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrogen production by steam reforming of methanol
    Iwasa, N
    Nomura, W
    Mayanagi, T
    Fujita, S
    Arai, M
    Takezawa, N
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2004, 37 (02) : 286 - 293
  • [2] Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production
    Palo, Daniel R.
    Dagle, Robert A.
    Holladay, Jamie D.
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2007, 107 (10) : 3992 - 4021
  • [3] Hydrogen Production by Methanol Steam Reforming Using Microreactor
    Kawamura, Yoshihiro
    Ogura, Naotsugu
    Igarashi, Akira
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, 2013, 56 (05) : 288 - 297
  • [4] Simulations of Hydrogen Production by Methanol Steam Reforming
    Chiu, Yu-Jen
    Chiu, Han-Chieh
    Hsieh, Ren-Horn
    Jang, Jer-Huan
    Jiang, Bo-Yi
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (CPESE 2018), 2019, 156 : 38 - 42
  • [5] Optimization of methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production
    Pan, L.-W. (panlw@dicp.ac.cn), 2013, Science Press (41):
  • [6] Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production in a minireactor
    Wang, Feng
    Li, Longjian
    Qi, Bo
    Cui, Wenzhi
    Xin, Mingdao
    Chen, Qinghua
    Deng, Lianfeng
    Hsi-An Chiao Tung Ta Hsueh/Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2008, 42 (04): : 509 - 514
  • [7] Intensification of hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming
    Sanz, Oihane
    Velasco, Ion
    Perez-Miqueo, Inigo
    Poyato, Rosalia
    Antonio Odriozola, Jose
    Montes, Mario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (10) : 5250 - 5259
  • [8] Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming using amorphous metal membranes
    Yamaura, Shin-ichi
    Uemiya, Shigeyuki
    Kimura, Hisamichi
    Inoue, Akihisa
    PRICM 6: SIXTH PACIFIC RIM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MATERIALS AND PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 561-565 : 1319 - +
  • [9] Nanosized catalysts for the production of hydrogen by methanol steam reforming
    Valdes-Solis, T.
    Marban, G.
    Fuertes, A. B.
    CATALYSIS TODAY, 2006, 116 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [10] Thermochemical Module for Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of Methanol
    A. V. Makunin
    M. S. Granovskii
    E. B. Ivanov
    V. M. Fomin
    Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2003, 39 : 704 - 710