Reliability and Validity of Nonverbal Thin Slices in Social Interactions

被引:41
作者
Murphy, Nora A. [1 ]
Hall, Judith A. [2 ]
Mast, Marianne Schmid [3 ]
Ruben, Mollie A. [2 ]
Frauendorfer, Denise [3 ]
Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle [4 ]
Roter, Debra L. [5 ]
Nguyen, Laurent [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Marymount Univ, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Technol Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Idiap Res Inst, Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
nonverbal behavior; coding; thin slices; reliability; validity; PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY; KNOWLEDGEABLE INFORMANTS; BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION; SELF-REPORTS; ACCURACY; COMMUNICATION; STABILITY; CUES; INTELLIGENCE; SITUATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0146167214559902
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Four studies investigated the reliability and validity of thin slices of nonverbal behavior from social interactions including (a) how well individual slices of a given behavior predict other slices in the same interaction; (b) how well a slice of a given behavior represents the entirety of that behavior within an interaction; (c) how long a slice is necessary to sufficiently represent the entirety of a behavior within an interaction; (d) which slices best capture the entirety of behavior, across different behaviors; and (e) which behaviors (of six measured behaviors) are best captured by slices. Notable findings included strong reliability and validity for thin slices of gaze and nods, and that a 1.5-min slice from the start of an interaction may adequately represent some behaviors. Results provide useful information to researchers making decisions about slice measurement of behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 213
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   The Study of Behaviour in Personality Psychology: Meaning, Importance and Measurement Author's Response [J].
Furr, R. Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2009, 23 (05) :437-453
[22]  
Goffman E., 1963, STIGMA NOTES MANAGEM
[23]   Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers [J].
Gosling, SD ;
John, OP ;
Craik, KH ;
Robins, RW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (05) :1337-1349
[24]   The importance of nonverbal cues in judging rapport [J].
Grahe, JE ;
Bernieri, FJ .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 23 (04) :253-269
[25]   Status roles and recall of nonverbal cues [J].
Hall, JA ;
Carter, JD ;
Horgan, TG .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 25 (02) :79-100
[26]   COMMUNICATION OF AFFECT BETWEEN PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN [J].
HALL, JA ;
ROTER, DL ;
RAND, CS .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1981, 22 (01) :18-30
[27]   Nonverbal Sensitivity in Medical Students: Implications for Clinical Interactions [J].
Hall, Judith A. ;
Roter, Debra L. ;
Blanch, Danielle C. ;
Frankel, Richard M. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (11) :1217-1222
[28]   Observer-rated rapport in interactions between medical students and standardized patients [J].
Hall, Judith A. ;
Roter, Debra L. ;
Blanch, Danielle C. ;
Frankel, Richard M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 76 (03) :323-327
[29]   Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests [J].
Hall, Judith A. ;
Andrzejewski, Susan A. ;
Murphy, Nora A. ;
Mast, Marianne Schmid ;
Feinstein, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2008, 42 (06) :1476-1489
[30]   PROFITING FROM CONTROVERSY - LESSONS FROM THE PERSON-SITUATION DEBATE [J].
KENRICK, DT ;
FUNDER, DC .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1988, 43 (01) :23-34