Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols

被引:82
作者
Qu, Xing-min [1 ]
Li, Gang [1 ]
Ludlow, John B. [2 ]
Zhang, Zu-yan [1 ]
Ma, Xu-chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Diagnost Sci & Gen Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2010年 / 110卷 / 06期
关键词
MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY; CBCT DEVICES; DOSIMETRY; CT; ACADEMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare effective doses resulting from different scan protocols for cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) using International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 1990 and 2007 calculations of dose. Study design. Average tissue-absorbed dose, equivalent dose, and effective dose for a ProMax 3D CBCT with different dental protocols were calculated using thermoluminescent dosimeter chips in a human equivalent phantom. Effective doses were derived using ICRP 1990 and the superseding 2007 recommendations. Results. Effective doses (ICRP 2007) for default patient sizes from small to large ranged from 102 to 298 mu Sv. The coefficient of determination (R-2) between tube current and effective dose (ICRP 2007) was 0.90. When scanning with lower resolution settings, the effective doses were reduced significantly (P < .05). Conclusions. ProMax 3D can provide a wide range of radiation dose levels. Reduction in radiation dose can be achieved when using lower settings of exposure parameters. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:770-776)
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 776
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography [J].
Carter, Laurie ;
Geist, James ;
Scarfe, William C. ;
Angelopoulos, Christos ;
Nair, Madhu K. ;
Odont, Lic ;
Hildebolt, Charles F. ;
Tyndall, Donald ;
Shrout, Michael .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 106 (04) :561-562
[2]  
Grimard BA, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P48, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080289, 10.1902/jop.2009.080289 ]
[3]   Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: A preliminary report [J].
Hamada, Y ;
Kondoh, T ;
Noguchi, K ;
Iino, M ;
Isono, H ;
Ishii, H ;
Mishima, A ;
Kobayashi, K ;
Seto, I .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (02) :128-137
[4]   Detection of Vertical Root Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth by a Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan [J].
Hassan, Bassam ;
Metska, Maria Elissavet ;
Ozok, Ahmet Rifat ;
van der Stelt, Paul ;
Wesselink, Paul Rudolf .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (05) :719-722
[5]  
Hatcher David C, 2003, J Calif Dent Assoc, V31, P825
[6]   Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology [J].
Horner, K. ;
Islam, M. ;
Flygare, L. ;
Tsiklakis, K. ;
Whaites, E. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (04) :187-195
[7]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), 1989, ICRU Report 44, P189
[8]   Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications [J].
Loubele, M. ;
Bogaerts, R. ;
Van Dijck, E. ;
Pauwels, R. ;
Vanheusden, S. ;
Suetens, P. ;
Marchal, G. ;
Sanderink, G. ;
Jacobs, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (03) :461-468
[9]   Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT [J].
Ludlow, J. B. ;
Davies-Ludlow, L. E. ;
Brooks, S. L. ;
Howerton, W. B. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (04) :219-226
[10]  
Ludlow JB., 2008, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V106, P106, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.TRIPLEO.2008.03.018, 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018]