Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany

被引:42
作者
Stamer, UM
Wiese, R
Stüber, F
Wulf, H
Meuser, T
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Caesarean section; complications; epidural anaesthesia; maternal deaths; neurological complications; spinal anaesthetic;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00583.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Initial data from 1996 revealed that in contrast to several other countries general anaesthesia was the preferred anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section in Germany. However, anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section has changed during the last decades world-wide. This investigation was performed to obtain more actual data on anaesthetic procedures in obstetric patients in German hospitals. Methods: Questionnaires on the practice of anaesthesia for Caesarean section were mailed to 918 German departments of anaesthesiology. Furthermore, the survey evaluated severe perioperative complications in obstetric patients. Results: The 397 completed replies in this survey represent 41.3% of all German deliveries in 2002. Spinal anaesthesia is now the most common technique (50.5%) for elective Caesarean section. In case of urgent and emergency Caesarean, delivery figures decrease to 34.6% and 4.8%, respectively. Epidural anaesthesia is performed in 21.6% of scheduled and 13.2% and 1.0% of non-scheduled urgent or emergency Caesarean sections, respectively. Four maternal deaths and several non-fatal episodes of gastric content aspiration were reported by the respondents. Conclusion: Compared to data obtained 6 years ago a significant increase in regional anaesthesia for Caesarean section has developed, with spinal anaesthesia being the preferred technique. Surveys can help to initiate discussion and improve current practice of anaesthetic care.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 176
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
COOPER GM, 2000, BRIT J ANAESTH, V89, P369
[2]   SOME MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOR [J].
CRAWFORD, JS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (12) :1219-1225
[3]  
*DEP HLTH SOC SEC, 2001, REP CONF ENQ MAT DEA
[4]  
Gogarten Wiebke, 2003, Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, V17, P377
[5]   Amniotic fluid embolism as an obstetric emergency-case report with fatal outcome [J].
Gürke, B ;
Bremerich, DH ;
Engels, K ;
Ahr, A ;
Kaufmann, M .
ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2001, 36 (04) :247-249
[6]   Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992 [J].
Hawkins, JL ;
Gibbs, CP ;
Orleans, M ;
MartinSalvaj, G ;
Beaty, B .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (01) :135-143
[7]   Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990 [J].
Hawkins, JL ;
Koonin, LM ;
Palmer, SK ;
Gibbs, CP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (02) :277-284
[8]  
Hawkins JL, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V93, P1
[9]   NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH PREGNANCY [J].
HOLDCROFT, A ;
GIBBERD, FB ;
HARGROVE, RL ;
HAWKINS, DF ;
DELLAPORTAS, CI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (05) :522-526
[10]   Paraesthesiae and nerve damage following combined spinal epidural and spinal anaesthesia: a pilot survey [J].
Holloway, J ;
Seed, PT ;
O'Sullivan, G ;
Reynolds, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2000, 9 (03) :151-155