Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has a greater early functional outcome when compared to manual total knee arthroplasty for isolated medial compartment arthritis

被引:32
作者
Clement, N. D. [1 ]
Bell, A. [1 ]
Simpson, P. [1 ]
Macpherson, G. [1 ]
Patton, J. T. [1 ]
Hamilton, D. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Spire Murrayfield Hosp, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Robotic; Knee; Arthroplasty; Partial; Total; Medial; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; PROXIMAL TIBIAL STRAIN; FORGOTTEN JOINT; MATCHED PATIENTS; OXFORD HIP; COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; ALIGNMENT; SCORES;
D O I
10.1302/2046-3758.91.BJR-2019-0147.R1
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The primary aim of the study was to compare the knee-specific functional outcome of robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) with manual total knee arthroplasty (mTKA) for the management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Secondary aims were to compare length of hospital stay, general health improvement, and satisfaction between rUKA and mTKA. Methods A powered (1:3 ratio) cohort study was performed. A total of 30 patients undergoing rUKA were propensity score matched to 90 patients undergoing mTKA for isolated medial compartment arthritis. Patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative function. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were collected preoperatively and six months postoperatively. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and patient satisfaction were collected six months postoperatively. Length of hospital stay was also recorded. Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative demographics (p >= 0.150) or function (p >= 0.230) between the groups. The six-month OKS was significantly greater in the rUKA group when compared with the mTKA group (difference 7.7, p < 0.001). There was also a greater six-month postoperative EQ-5D (difference 0.148, p = 0.002) and FJS (difference 24.2, p < 0.001) for the rUKA when compared to the mTKA. No patient was dissatisfied in the rUKA group and five (6%) were dissatisfied in the mTKA, but this was not significant (p = 0.210). Length of stay was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter in the rUKA group (median two days, interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 3) compared to the mTKA (median four days, IQR 3 to 5). Conclusion Patients with isolated medial compartment arthritis had a greater knee-specific functional outcome and generic health with a shorter length of hospital stay after rUKA when compared to mTKA.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty A BIOMECHANICAL MODEL USING DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION [J].
Ali, A. M. ;
Newman, S. D. S. ;
Hooper, P. A. ;
Davies, C. M. ;
Cobb, J. P. .
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (08) :522-529
[2]  
[Anonymous], NAT JOINT REG 14 ANN
[3]   Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement [J].
Baker, P. N. ;
Petheram, T. ;
Jameson, S. S. ;
Avery, P. J. ;
Reed, M. R. ;
Gregg, P. J. ;
Deehan, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (07) :919-927
[4]   Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery [J].
Beard, David J. ;
Harris, Kristina ;
Dawson, Jill ;
Doll, Helen ;
Murray, David W. ;
Carr, Andrew J. ;
Price, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) :73-79
[5]   The "Forgotten Joint" as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure [J].
Behrend, Henrik ;
Giesinger, Karlmeinrad ;
Giesinger, Johannes M. ;
Kuster, Markus S. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (03) :430-436
[6]   Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bell, Stuart W. ;
Anthony, Iain ;
Jones, Bryn ;
MacLean, Angus ;
Rowe, Philip ;
Blyth, Mark .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (08) :627-635
[7]   Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty EXPLORATORY SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
Blyth, M. J. G. ;
Anthony, I. ;
Rowe, P. ;
Banger, M. S. ;
MacLean, A. ;
Jones, B. .
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (11) :631-639
[8]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[9]   What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? a systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme [J].
Browne, John Patrick ;
Bastaki, Hamad ;
Dawson, Jill .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
[10]   Ten-year patient-reported outcomes following total and minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis [J].
Burn, Edward ;
Sanchez-Santos, Maria T. ;
Pandit, Hemant G. ;
Hamilton, Thomas W. ;
Liddle, Alexander D. ;
Murray, David W. ;
Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (05) :1455-1464