Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy Entropy-based WASPAS approach for aircraft type selection

被引:40
作者
Deveci, Muhammet [1 ]
Oner, Sultan Ceren [2 ]
Ciftci, Muharrem Enis [3 ]
Ozcan, Ender [4 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Huawei Turkey R&D Ctr, AI Enablement Dept, TR-34768 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Atlas Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34408 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Comp Sci, Computat Optimisat & Learning COL Lab, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[5] Univ Def Belgrade, Mil Acad, Dept Logist, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Airline; Hybrid fuzzy method; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; AIRLINES EFFICIENCY; 2-STAGE TOPSIS; ELECTRE II; SETS; MODEL; EXTENSION; AHP; STRATEGIES; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108076
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Choosing the most appropriate aircraft type for a given route is one of the crucial issues that the decision makers at airline companies have to address under uncertainty based on various commercial, marketing and operational criteria. A novel multi-criteria decision making approach integrating Entropy-based Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method and interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets (IT2HFS) is introduced for tackling this problem and tested using a particular case study obtained from a full service carrier in Turkey. This study contributes to representing and handling degrees of uncertainty in the decision making process of aircraft type selection based on the IT2HFS. The results showed that Airbus 32C is the suitable alternative for a given route in between Kuwait and Istanbul airports. The experts evaluated the results and confirmed that the proposed approach is the most suitable one when compared to four other IT2HFS based approaches. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [41] Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple
    Mendel, JM
    John, RI
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2002, 10 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [42] Mihajlovic J., 2019, OPER RES ENG SCI, V2, P72
  • [43] Application of normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy sets to site selection for hydrogen underground storage
    Narayanamoorthy, Samayan
    Ramya, L.
    Baleanu, Dumitru
    Kureethara, Joseph Varghese
    Annapoorani, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (54) : 28874 - 28892
  • [44] Nenadic D., 2019, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, V2, P115, DOI DOI 10.31181/DMAME1901115N
  • [45] Strategic Decision Selection Using Hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP: A case study
    Onar, Sezi Cevik
    Oztaysi, Basar
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2014, 7 (05) : 1002 - 1021
  • [46] ONER SC, 2018, SOFT COMPUT, P1
  • [47] The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Cirovic, Goran
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3016 - 3028
  • [48] Evaluating the strategic design parameters of airports in Thailand to meet service expectations of Low-Cost Airlines using the Fuzzy-based QFD method
    Pandey, Mukesh Mohan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2020, 82
  • [49] Fuel burn rates of commercial passenger aircraft: variations by seat configuration and stage distance
    Park, Yongha
    O'Kelly, Morton E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 41 : 137 - 147
  • [50] Study on Energy Management Strategies for Series-parallel Plug-in Hybrid Electric Buses
    Peng, Jiankun
    He, Hongwen
    Xiong, Rui
    [J]. CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 : 1926 - 1931