Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy Entropy-based WASPAS approach for aircraft type selection

被引:40
作者
Deveci, Muhammet [1 ]
Oner, Sultan Ceren [2 ]
Ciftci, Muharrem Enis [3 ]
Ozcan, Ender [4 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Huawei Turkey R&D Ctr, AI Enablement Dept, TR-34768 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Atlas Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34408 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Comp Sci, Computat Optimisat & Learning COL Lab, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[5] Univ Def Belgrade, Mil Acad, Dept Logist, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Airline; Hybrid fuzzy method; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; AIRLINES EFFICIENCY; 2-STAGE TOPSIS; ELECTRE II; SETS; MODEL; EXTENSION; AHP; ATTRIBUTES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108076
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Choosing the most appropriate aircraft type for a given route is one of the crucial issues that the decision makers at airline companies have to address under uncertainty based on various commercial, marketing and operational criteria. A novel multi-criteria decision making approach integrating Entropy-based Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method and interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets (IT2HFS) is introduced for tackling this problem and tested using a particular case study obtained from a full service carrier in Turkey. This study contributes to representing and handling degrees of uncertainty in the decision making process of aircraft type selection based on the IT2HFS. The results showed that Airbus 32C is the suitable alternative for a given route in between Kuwait and Istanbul airports. The experts evaluated the results and confirmed that the proposed approach is the most suitable one when compared to four other IT2HFS based approaches. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Decomposition theorems and extension principles for hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. ;
Torra, Vicenc .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2018, 41 :48-56
[2]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[3]   Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :3992-3998
[4]  
Ayhan M.B., 2018, Sakarya University Journal Science, V22, P1
[5]   An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Wanke, Peter .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 44-45 :90-102
[6]   Addressing a sustainable supplier selection and order allocation problem by an integrated approach: a case of automobile manufacturing [J].
Beiki, Hossein ;
Mohammad Seyedhosseini, Seyed ;
V. Ponkratov, Vadim ;
Olegovna Zekiy, Angelina ;
Ivanov, Sergei Anatolyevich .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2021, 38 (04) :239-253
[7]  
Belobaba P P., 2015, The Global Airline Industry, V2nd, P75
[8]   Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making [J].
Chang, YH ;
Yeh, CH .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 29 (05) :405-415
[9]   Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems [J].
Chen, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 292 :175-197
[10]   Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets [J].
Chen, Shyi-Ming ;
Yang, Ming-Wey ;
Lee, Li-Wei ;
Yang, Szu-Wei .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (05) :5295-5308