Turkish Version of The Amputee Body Image Scale and Relationship with Quality of Life

被引:10
作者
Safaz, Ismail [1 ]
Yilmaz, Bilge [1 ]
Goktepe, Ahmet Salim [1 ]
Yazicioglu, Kamil [1 ]
机构
[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Turkish Armed Forces Rehabil Ctr Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
来源
KLINIK PSIKOFARMAKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY | 2010年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Amputee; body image; quality of life; LOWER-LIMB AMPUTATION; VALIDITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1080/10177833.2010.11790638
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To adapt the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) into Turkish and to assess the reliability of the original and revised Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS-R) in lower limb amputees. Method: Turkish version of the ABIS (20 items; ratings of 1-5) was administered to 91 lower-limb amputee patients wearing prosthesis. One month later, retest was applied to 37 patients. SF-36 was also administered to 37 patients for validity. The scores have been reevaluated for the reliability of the ABIS-R (14 items; ratings of 0-2). Results: Turkish version of the ABIS and ABIS-R fitted the unidimensional construct that the scale was intended to measure and demonstrated good reliability. Cronbach's alpha was 0.88 for the ABIS and 0.86 for the ABIS-R. Items-total correlation ranged from 0.25 (item 3) to 0.75 (items 8 and 14) for the ABIS. Items-total correlation ranged from 0.33 (item 3) to 0.76 (items 6 and 81 for the ABIS-R. Test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.78 for the ABIS and 0.74 for the ABIS-R. Negative correlations with SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.33 (mental health) to 0.60 (physical functioning) for the ABIS and ranged from 0.31 (mental health) to 0.60 (physical functioning) for the ABIS-R. Conclusions: We conclude that the Turkish versions of ABIS and ABIS-R demonstrate good reliability for measuring body image disturbances in individuals with lower-limb amputations. Moreover, the two scales displayed significant correlations with SF-36.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 83
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, J Prosthet Orthot, DOI DOI 10.1097/00008526-199704000-00004
[2]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[3]  
DEMIRAL Y, 2006, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P6
[4]   Body image and patients with amputations: does the prosthesis maintain the balance? [J].
Fisher, K ;
Hanspal, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1998, 21 (04) :355-363
[5]   The trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales and quality of life in people with lower-limb amputation [J].
Gallagher, P ;
MacLachlan, M .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (05) :730-736
[6]   Body image in people with lower-limb amputation - A Rasch analysis of the amputee body image scale [J].
Gallagher, Pamela ;
Horgan, Olga ;
Franchignoni, Franco ;
Giordano, Andrea ;
MacLachlan, Malcolm .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2007, 86 (03) :205-215
[7]  
Kocyigit H., 1999, J Drug Ther, V12, P102
[8]  
Lackey N.R., 2003, Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781412984898.N4, 10.4135/9781412984898.n4]
[9]   Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients [J].
Pinar, R .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (01) :259-264
[10]  
RYBARCZYK B, 1995, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V40, P95