MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment

被引:133
作者
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Wei, Guiwu [1 ]
Wei, Cun [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Yu [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610101, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[3] Yunnan Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Kunming 650221, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MAGDM problems; Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs); MABAC model; Q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted average (q-ROFWA) operators; Q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted geometric (q-ROFWG) operators; Q-ROFNs MABAC model; Construction project; SYMMETRIC MEAN OPERATORS; TODIM APPROACH; VIKOR METHOD; EXTENSION; SELECTION; TOPSIS; PROJECT; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.019
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As the generalization of intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) and Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS), the q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS) has emerged as a more meaningful and effective tool to solve multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in management and scientific domains. The MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) model, which handles the complex and uncertain decision making issues by computing the distance between each alternative and the bored approximation area (BAA), has been investigated by an increasing number of researchers more recent years. In our article, consider the conventional MABAC model and some fundamental theories of q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS), we shall introduce the q-rung orthopair fuzzy MABAC model to solve MADM problems. at first, we briefly review some basic theories related to q-ROFS and conventional MABAC model. Furthermore, the q-rung orthopair fuzzy MABAC model is built and the decision making steps are described. In the end, An actual MADM application has been given to testify this new model and some comparisons between this novel MABAC model and two q-ROFNs aggregation operators are provided to further demonstrate the merits of the q-rung orthopair fuzzy MABAC model. (C) 2020 China Ordnance Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 216
页数:9
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Novel mPolar Fuzzy Linguistic ELECTRE-I Method for Group Decision-Making [J].
Adeel, Arooj ;
Akram, Muhammad ;
Ahmed, Imran ;
Nazar, Kashif .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (04)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, MATHEMATICS BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/MATH7050442
[3]   MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) :37-45
[4]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[5]   Seven-dimensional automated construction waste quantification and management framework: Integration with project and site planning [J].
Bakchan, Amal ;
Faust, Kasey M. ;
Leite, Fernanda .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 146 :462-474
[6]   Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS for multicriteria group decision-making with unknown weight information through entropy measure [J].
Biswas, Animesh ;
Sarkar, Biswajit .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (06) :1108-1128
[7]   Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach through point operator-based similarity measures for multicriteria group decision making [J].
Biswas, Animesh ;
Sarkar, Biswajit .
KYBERNETES, 2019, 48 (03) :496-519
[8]   A Fuzzy-Based Risk Assessment Methodology for Construction Projects Under Epistemic Uncertainty [J].
Biswas, Tarun Kumer ;
Zaman, Kais .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 21 (04) :1221-1240
[9]  
Bojanic D., 2018, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, V1, P51, DOI DOI 10.31181/DMAME180151B
[10]  
Bozanic D., 2016, TECHNICS, V71, P97