共 37 条
Screening for Lifetime History of Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older American and Irish Adults at Risk for Dementia: Development and Validation of a Web-Based Survey
被引:13
作者:
Gardner, Raquel C.
[1
,2
,3
]
Rivera, Ernesto
[1
,9
]
O'Grady, Megan
[4
]
Doherty, Colin
[5
]
Yaffe, Kristine
[1
,2
,3
,6
,7
]
Corrigan, John D.
[8
]
Bogner, Jennifer
[8
]
Kramer, Joel
[1
,3
]
Wilson, Fiona
[4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Memory & Aging Ctr, Sandler Neurosci Ctr, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sandler Neurosci Ctr, Global Brain Hlth Inst, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Dublin, Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Discipline Physiotherapy, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Univ Dublin, Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Trinity Inst Neurosci TCIN, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[8] Ohio State Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[9] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词:
Clinical research;
cognitive aging;
reliability;
screening;
traumatic brain injury;
validation;
MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT;
ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE;
HEAD-INJURY;
RELIABILITY;
VALIDITY;
CONSCIOUSNESS;
ASSOCIATION;
PREVALENCE;
SAMPLE;
AGE;
D O I:
10.3233/JAD-191138
中图分类号:
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号:
071006 ;
摘要:
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an established risk factor for dementia but mechanisms are uncertain. Accurate TBI exposure classification is critical for cognitive aging research studies seeking to discover mechanisms and treatments of post-TBI dementia. Brief TBI screens, commonly used in epidemiological studies of cognitive aging, are insensitive, leading to exposure mis-classification. Comprehensive TBI interviews, while more sensitive, may be impractical. Objective: We aimed to develop and validate a scalable, self-administered, comprehensive, web-based, TBI exposure survey for use in international cognitive aging research. Methods: We adapted a gold-standard comprehensive TBI interview (the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method; OSU TBI-ID) into a self-administered web-based survey for older adults (Older Adult modification of the OSU TBI-ID; OA OSU TBI-ID). We assessed reliability of our web-based survey versus the gold-standard interview among 97 older adults with normal cognition and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, we assessed sensitivity of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACC UDS) brief TBI screen versus the interview among 70 older adults with normal cognition. Results: Our OA OSU TBI-ID web-based survey had good to excellent reliability versus the interview (kappa 0.66-0.73; ICCs 0.68-0.81) even among the sub-set with MCI (kappa 0.74-0.88; ICCs 0.76-0.85), except for several age-at-injury variables. The NACC UDS brief TBI screen missed 50% of TBI exposures identified using the OSU TBI-ID interview. Conclusion: The OSU TBI-ID interview and web-based survey may facilitate more accurate TBI exposure classification in cognitive aging research thereby accelerating discovery of targetable mechanisms of post-TBI dementia.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 711
页数:13
相关论文