Demystifying the Institutional Review Board

被引:2
作者
Hicks, Rodney W. [1 ]
Hines, Kelli [2 ]
Henson, Bradley [3 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Grad Nursing, Adm & Res, Pomona, CA 91766 USA
[2] Western Univ Hlth Sci, Harriet K & Philip Pumerantz Lib, Pomona, CA USA
[3] Western Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Dent Med, Pomona, CA USA
关键词
institutional review board (IRB); ethics; research; informed consent; quality improvement; OVERSIGHT; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1002/aorn.13498
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Perioperative nurses are responsible for generating and using evidence to improve patient care. To protect human participants during research activities, government regulations enacted after widely publicized research misconduct specify that institutions receiving federal funds must have an institutional review board (IRB) comprising at least five members. Board members have many responsibilities, including completing a thorough review of each section of the application and attachments (eg, consent documents). To expedite the IRB approval processes, applicants should create and submit a well-written application. Applicants should understand that the application addresses the important ethical concepts of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Quality improvement activities (ie, local activities that seek to improve patient care or clinical outcomes) differ from research activities that focus on creating new knowledge. Depending on the purpose, design, and generalizability of a quality improvement project, the applicant may need to submit the project to the IRB for approval.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 318
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Amdur R., 2011, Institutional review board member handbook, V3rd
[2]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Final Report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee
[4]  
[Anonymous], DECLARATION HELSINKI
[5]  
[Anonymous], HHS Historical Highlights
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Proposed revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences
[7]  
HISTORY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1938, The New York Times, P21
[9]   Bringing Balance to Institutional Review Board Oversight in Human Subject Research [J].
Arslanian-Engoren, Cynthia ;
Moser, Debra K. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2013, 28 (06) :495-497
[10]  
Bierer Barbara E, 2019, Ethics Hum Res, V41, P29, DOI 10.1002/eahr.500017