Morphology of human neutrophils: A comparison of cryofixation, routine gluteraldehyde fixation, and the effects of dimethyl sulfoxide

Cell shape and density are critical to the evaluation of neutrophil function and/or activation. Dimethyl sulfoxide-cryofixation-freeze-substitution processing (DCF) instantly preserves cell processes and ultrastructural elements with fewer artifacts than routine chemical fixation with glutaraldehyde and postfixation osmium tetroxide (GO). This study morphometrically examined density-separated neutrophils to assess differences in DCF and GO processing procedures and studied the effect of dimethyl sulfoxide followed by GO fixation (DGO) on morphology. Fifteen consecutive neutrophils were analyzed using computerized planimetry for differences in DCF v. GO treatments (n = 4) and DGO v. GO treatments (n = 4). Cryofixed and DGO-fixed cells were significantly rounder than GO cells which had a more irregular surface with membrane projections. The cell volume of GO cells was 27-30% smaller than in DCF or DGO processing, while the surface area was similar. The increased volume in DCF and DGO cells did not appear to be due to abnormal cell swelling, since membranes, nuclear envelope, and mitochondrial cristae were more intact than in GO cells. Preservation of mitochondria as well as endocytic caveolae with a subplasmalemmal coating was best in DCF samples, moderate in DGO, and poorest in GO. Morphometric data showed that the nuclear compartment was 22% smaller, while the cytoplasm land its associated compartments) was 29% smaller in GO compared to DCF-processed neutrophils. This was consistent with the more dense cytoplasm in GO cells. Pretreatment of neutrophils with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) resulted in volume preservation and improved the morphology of GO fixation. In summary, DCF appears to be an excellent method for preserving neutrophil membranes and cytoplasmic organelles (particularly mitochondria), and prevents a number of artifacts caused by routine GO fixation. Morphology can also be improved by using DMSO in conjunction with GO. Anat. Rec. 252:254-263, 1998. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.