Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union

被引:57
作者
Jager, T
Vermeire, TG
Rikken, MGJ
van der Poel, P
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, RIVM, Lab Ecotoxicol, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, RIVM, Ctr Subst & Risk Assessment, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, RIVM, Lab Waste Mat & Emiss, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
EUSES; TGD; risk assessment; uncertainty analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00087-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In risk assessment of new and existing substances, it is current practice to characterise risk using a deterministic quotient of the exposure concentration, or the dose, and a no-effect level. A sense of uncertainty is tackled by introducing worst-case assumptions in the methodology. Since this procedure leads to an assessment with an unknown degree of conservatism, it is advisable to deal quantitatively with uncertainties. This paper discusses the advantages and possibilities of a probabilistic risk assessment framework, illustrated with an example calculation. Furthermore, representatives of EU Member States and the chemical industry were interviewed to find out their views on applying uncertainty analysis to risk assessment of industrial chemicals. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR HAZARDOUS CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON LOGISTICALLY DISTRIBUTED NOEC TOXICITY DATA [J].
ALDENBERG, T ;
SLOB, W .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1993, 25 (01) :48-63
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, EPA630R97001 USEPA
[3]   Some thoughts concerning quotients, risks, and decision-making [J].
Bartell, SM .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (01) :25-29
[4]   COMPARING THE RESULTS OF A MONTE-CARLO ANALYSIS WITH EPAS REASONABLE MAXIMUM EXPOSED INDIVIDUAL (RMEI) - A CASE-STUDY OF A FORMER WOOD TREATMENT SITE [J].
COPELAND, TL ;
PAUSTENBACH, DJ ;
HARRIS, MA ;
OTANI, J .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 18 (02) :275-312
[5]   ECOTOXICOLOGICAL RISK-EVALUATION OF THE CATIONIC FABRIC SOFTENER DTDMAC .2. EXPOSURE MODELING [J].
DENIJS, T ;
DEGREEF, J .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1992, 24 (05) :611-627
[6]  
*EC, 1996, CR4896001 EC OFF PUB
[7]  
*EC, 1996, EUSES EUR UN SYST EV
[8]   THE BENEFITS OF PROBABILISTIC EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT - 3 CASE-STUDIES INVOLVING CONTAMINATED AIR, WATER, AND SOIL [J].
FINLEY, B ;
PAUSTENBACH, D .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (01) :53-73
[9]   RECOMMENDED DISTRIBUTIONS FOR EXPOSURE FACTORS FREQUENTLY USED IN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
FINLEY, B ;
PROCTOR, D ;
SCOTT, P ;
HARRINGTOIN, N ;
PAUSTENBACH, D ;
PRICE, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (04) :533-551
[10]   PROPAGATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN RISK ASSESSMENTS - THE NEED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN UNCERTAINTY DUE TO LACK OF KNOWLEDGE AND UNCERTAINTY DUE TO VARIABILITY [J].
HOFFMAN, FO ;
HAMMONDS, JS .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (05) :707-712