Immune Responses and Protection against Experimental Brucella suis Biovar 1 Challenge in Nonvaccinated or B. abortus Strain RB51-Vaccinated Cattle

被引:14
作者
Olsen, S. C. [1 ]
Hennager, S. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Infect Bacterial Dis Livestock Res Unit, Natl Anim Dis Ctr, USDA, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Anim & Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, USDA, Natl Vet Serv Lab, Ames, IA USA
关键词
VACCINATION; RB51;
D O I
10.1128/CVI.00326-10
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Twenty Hereford heifers approximately 9 months of age were vaccinated with saline (control) or 2 x 10(10) CFU of the Brucella abortus strain RB51 (RB51) vaccine. Immunologic responses after inoculation demonstrated significantly greater (P < 0.05) antibody and proliferative responses to RB51 antigens in cattle vaccinated with RB51 than in the controls. Pregnant cattle received a conjunctival challenge at approximately 6 months of gestation with 10(7) CFU of B. suis bv. 1 strains isolated from naturally infected cattle. The fluorescence polarization assay and the buffered acid plate agglutination test had the highest sensitivities in detecting B. suis-infected cattle between 2 and 12 weeks after experimental infection. Serologic responses and lymphocyte proliferative responses to B. suis antigens did not differ between control and RB51 vaccinees after experimental infection. No abortions occurred in cattle in either treatment group after challenge, although there appeared to be an increased incidence of retained placenta after parturition in both the control and the RB51 vaccination treatment groups. Our data suggest that the mammary gland is a preferred site for B. suis localization in cattle. Vaccination with RB51 did not reduce B. suis infection rates in maternal or fetal tissues. In conclusion, although B. suis is unlikely to cause abortions and fetal losses in cattle, our data suggest that RB51 vaccination will not protect cattle against B. suis infection after exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:1891 / 1895
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Alton G.G., 1988, TECHNIQUES BRUCELLOS
[2]   Physiology and Treatment of Retained Fetal Membranes in Cattle [J].
Beagley, J. C. ;
Whitman, K. J. ;
Baptiste, K. E. ;
Scherzer, J. .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (02) :261-268
[3]   DIFFERENTIATION OF BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-1, BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-2, AND BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-4, BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS, BRUCELLA-OVIS, AND BRUCELLA-SUIS-BV-1 BY PCR [J].
BRICKER, BJ ;
HALLING, SM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (11) :2660-2666
[4]  
Cheville NF, 1996, AM J VET RES, V57, P1153
[5]   ISOLATION OF BRUCELLA-SUIS FROM CATTLE [J].
COOK, DR ;
NOBLE, JW .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1984, 61 (08) :263-264
[6]   THE IDENTITY, DISTRIBUTION AND EPIZOOTIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BRUCELLA ISOLATES IN AUSTRALIA, 1981 TO 1985 [J].
CRICHTON, R ;
MEDVECZKY, NE .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1987, 64 (02) :48-52
[7]  
DAHOO IR, 1986, CAN J VET RES, V50, P485
[8]   Brucella suis biovar 1 in naturally infected cattle:: a bacteriological, serological, and histological study [J].
Ewalt, DR ;
Payeur, JB ;
Rhyan, JC ;
Geer, PL .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 1997, 9 (04) :417-420
[9]  
Hutton T., 2006, DIS RISK ASS INCREAS
[10]   Brucella isolated in humans and animals in Latin America from 1968 to 2006 [J].
Lucero, N. E. ;
Ayala, S. M. ;
Escobar, G. I. ;
Jacob, N. R. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2008, 136 (04) :496-503